2013
DOI: 10.46743/1540-580x/2013.1439
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and Validation of a Questionnaire to Assess the Effect of Online Learning on Behaviors, Attitudes, and Clinical Practices of Physical Therapists in the United States Regarding Evidenced-based Clinical Practice

Abstract: Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the face and content validity of a modified self-report questionnaire adapted from previous studies’ questionnaires. The modified questionnaire will be used in a later study to assess the effect of online learning on behaviors, attitudes, and clinical practices of physical therapists in the United States regarding evidence-based clinical practice. Methods: An expert panel of nine physical therapists in the field of evidence-based practice reviewed and rated th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
44
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
44
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Adjustment for covariates reduced the r-value for all nutrients to <0.20, albeit with a significant p-value, indicating the influence of these factors [16], in line with other studies [25]. However, it is important to note that the practice of covariate adjustment is not commonly reported in other studies [26,43,57,58].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Adjustment for covariates reduced the r-value for all nutrients to <0.20, albeit with a significant p-value, indicating the influence of these factors [16], in line with other studies [25]. However, it is important to note that the practice of covariate adjustment is not commonly reported in other studies [26,43,57,58].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…The Scale-Content Validity Index (S-CVI) is the proportion of items on a scale that received a relevance score of ≥4 by all specialists [42]. The considerable score for S-CVI was ≥0.78 when >9 specialists were involved [43].…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The item content validity index (CVI) is computed as the quotient between the total sum of points obtained by an item and the maximum possible number of points (see Table 2). Usually, a CVI index of greater than .80 is a high value which denotes a high level of agreement (Sangoseni et al, 2013). All the items passed this criterion.…”
Section: Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The average content validity score is 0.84, which is higher than the minimum acceptable value of 0.78. This indicates that all the items can be included in the final instrument (Sangoseni et al, 2013). A pilot study was conducted among 35 undergraduate pharmacy students who were excluded from the final analysis.…”
Section: Study Instrumentmentioning
confidence: 99%