2020
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17176050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and Validation of a Wearable Inertial Sensors-Based Automated System for Assessing Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders in the Workspace

Abstract: The industrial societies face difficulty applying traditional work-related musculoskeletal disorder (WMSD) risk assessment methods in practical applications due to in-situ task dynamics, complex data processing, and the need of ergonomics professionals. This study aims to develop and validate a wearable inertial sensors-based automated system for assessing WMSD risks in the workspace conveniently, in order to enhance workspace safety and improve workers’ health. Both postural ergonomic analysis (RULA/REBA) and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the sensor platform design derives also from the consideration that in the observational methods for the estimation of ergonomics, the movement of the back, such as for neck, is associated with a single-segment biomechanical model. Consequently, considering for example spine as a single joint segment, trunk angle can be calculated from a single IMU commonly placed either on the chest [ 22 ] or on the upper back [ 21 , 25 ] or through 2 IMUs positioned respectively at the sacral level (as a body reference) and the other at the mid-thoracic level [ 33 ]. Our selection was based on this last configuration; in fact, the first sensor was placed in correspondence with the sacral level (IMU1), the second at the thoracic level (IMU2), and the last in the head region (IMU3) (see Figure 3 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the sensor platform design derives also from the consideration that in the observational methods for the estimation of ergonomics, the movement of the back, such as for neck, is associated with a single-segment biomechanical model. Consequently, considering for example spine as a single joint segment, trunk angle can be calculated from a single IMU commonly placed either on the chest [ 22 ] or on the upper back [ 21 , 25 ] or through 2 IMUs positioned respectively at the sacral level (as a body reference) and the other at the mid-thoracic level [ 33 ]. Our selection was based on this last configuration; in fact, the first sensor was placed in correspondence with the sacral level (IMU1), the second at the thoracic level (IMU2), and the last in the head region (IMU3) (see Figure 3 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It follows from the above that technical, organizational, and other measures can be proposed in two basic areas: measures to reduce the level of excessive physical strain at work, and measures to reduce the level of excessive mental workload. The basic technical measures that eliminate or reduce the increased physical load at work to the lowest possible level can generally include: (according to Decree 542/2007 of the Ministry of Health of the Slovak Republic): ergonomic adjustment of the workplace; restriction or complete ban on the use of products, tools, and equipment, which cause increased physical strain at work, i.e., technological processes; requirements for adequate microclimatic conditions [50][51][52][53].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ergonomic risk assessment is an important task in evaluating risk activities in the workplace [1,44]. Ergonomic risk assessment supports provision of a healthy work environment and the design of a workplace for optimum work performance [1].…”
Section: Ergonomic Risk Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach is also suitable to be conducted on a large scale of issues [48]. In a recent study, Huang et al [44] developed a method for assessing WMSDs in the workspace using a wearable inertial sensor-based automated system to overcome the limitations of traditional WMSDs risk assessment methods. The study reported that the wearable inertial sensor-based automated system has the potential to be used for WMSDs risk assessments of workers when performing tasks in a workspace.…”
Section: Ergonomic Risk Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%