2020
DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2020.557147
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and Validation of a Mathematical Model to Predict the Complexity of FMR1 Allele Combinations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1b). To compare PM samples behavior with that of the previously published using the same mathematical model, samples from that publication were used as a reference (Rodrigues et al 2020). A distribution into four quadrants, separated by an allelic score of 150 was obtained in all sets, similarly to that obtained in the reference set, revealing the same distinct behaviors (Fig.…”
Section: Mathematical Model Validationmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…1b). To compare PM samples behavior with that of the previously published using the same mathematical model, samples from that publication were used as a reference (Rodrigues et al 2020). A distribution into four quadrants, separated by an allelic score of 150 was obtained in all sets, similarly to that obtained in the reference set, revealing the same distinct behaviors (Fig.…”
Section: Mathematical Model Validationmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The reference set, composed by one hundred and thirty-one female samples with normal (n = 127) and intermediate genotypes (n = 4), was previously described and characterized in Rodrigues et al (Rodrigues et al 2020) (the summary of the results can be found in Supplementary Table 1).…”
Section: Reference Setmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…each woman, we calculated the FMR1 allelic complexity score developed by Rodrigues et al(Rodrigues et al, 2020), which integrates the AGG interspersion number and pattern but also the total repeat length, to reflect the polymorphic CGG/AGG substructure of the 5 0 UTR of FMR1. We were not able to calculate the allele score for 8 patients in the POI group and 4 in the pregnant women group because the graphs were not available.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%