2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuro.2006.03.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and validation of a test battery to assess subtle neurodevelopmental differences in children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The two groups appear comparable. By and large, scores are similar to a US reference sample (Davidson et al, 2006). The frequency distributions for the behavioral endpoints are shown in Table 1b.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 51%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The two groups appear comparable. By and large, scores are similar to a US reference sample (Davidson et al, 2006). The frequency distributions for the behavioral endpoints are shown in Table 1b.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 51%
“…That study also found an adverse association with prenatal MeHg when nutrients were included in the model. Other studies have reported associations between total fish consumption and developmental outcomes, but they did not specifically measure LCPUFA (Davidson et al, 2006, Decsi and Koletzko 2005, Dunstan et al, 2008, Schober et al, 2003). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Several groups have used the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB) computer tests to study specific groups of children thought to have an impaired development. Deficits in these tests appear for children identified as ‘hard to manage’ [17], born prematurely [18] or exposed to neurotoxins during development [19]. Nutrition itself is also a critical factor in normal cognitive development among children [20] so having a method to monitor learning skills in combination with BMI measures is very relevant.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%