2010
DOI: 10.1080/13548506.2010.487107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and validation of a self-report for the assessment of adjustment disorders

Abstract: Based on a recent diagnostic proposal for adjustment disorders a self-report assessment was developed. The current study reports validation results. Psychometric properties were examined using two different samples of 687 patients with cardiac arrhythmias and 86 patients from a psychosomatic outpatient clinic. Besides evaluating the internal structure and re-test reliability, associations with quality of life, general anxiety and depression, symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder and coping strategies were … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

13
113
0
7

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(133 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
13
113
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…We used the eight items that measure preoccupation, failure to adapt, and functional impairment to build a total sum score (ADNM-8). The ADNM-20 showed satisfactory properties regarding factor structure, internal consistency, retest-reliability, and construct validity (Bley, Einsle, Maercker, Weidner, & Joraschky, 2008; Einsle et al, 2010; Glaesmer et al, 2015) in previous studies. The use of the ADNM-8 found initial support in two previous studies (Kazlauskas, Gegieckaite, Maercker, Eimontas, & Zelviene, 2018; Zelviene et al, 2017).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We used the eight items that measure preoccupation, failure to adapt, and functional impairment to build a total sum score (ADNM-8). The ADNM-20 showed satisfactory properties regarding factor structure, internal consistency, retest-reliability, and construct validity (Bley, Einsle, Maercker, Weidner, & Joraschky, 2008; Einsle et al, 2010; Glaesmer et al, 2015) in previous studies. The use of the ADNM-8 found initial support in two previous studies (Kazlauskas, Gegieckaite, Maercker, Eimontas, & Zelviene, 2018; Zelviene et al, 2017).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…AjD Symptom Severity was assessed using the Adjustment Disorder – New Module 20 (ADNM-20; Einsle, Köllner, Dannemann, & Maercker, 2010). The ADNM-20 is a self-report questionnaire that evaluates previous life events and AjD symptoms in response to the most severe life event (Einsle et al, 2010).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This AjD measure was proposed prior to the ICD-11 proposals with an introduction of the ADNM in 2007 (Einsle, Köllner, Dannemann, & Maercker, 2010; Maercker, Einsle, & Köllner, 2007). The ADNM has two parts.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To the best of our knowledge, the only ICD-11 based measure currently available is the Adjustment Disorder New Module (ADNM) (Einsle et al, 2010) which was used in all 10 reviewed studies. The validity of the ADNM has been tested in two studies (Bachem et al, 2016; Lorenz et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%