Development and Validation of a Questionnaire to Assess Creative Potential Traits

Penagos-Corzo, Julio C.; Saucedo, Axel

doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.756079

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 89 publications

(91 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Discriminant validity was examined at both the item and construct levels. As shown in Table 4, at the construct level, the square roots of the AVE were higher than those of the respective correlation coefficients [76]. Thus, discriminant validity was supported.…”

Section: Measurement Modelmentioning

confidence: 77%

Chinese Consumers’ Trust in Food Safety Surveillance Sampling of Commonly Consumed Foods

Wang

Yang

Liang

et al. 2022

Foods

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In China, food has become safer over the past five years, especially commonly consumed foods. Food supervision sampling has played an important role in improving food safety. However, consumer acceptance of the results of food safety supervision have not kept pace. Communicating actual food safety risks to consumers and improving the public trust in food safety supervision sampling inspection has become an important issue. This study focused on food safety surveillance sampling of commonly consumed foods. In total, 4408 adult consumers were surveyed between August and October 2021. Structural equation modeling was performed for data analysis. This study found significant differences along gender lines and across different cities and levels of education with respect to evaluating competence trust and care trust on food supervision sampling inspection. This study identified the public’s competence trust, care trust, and perception of food safety as factors that significantly affect one’s attitude toward supervision sampling inspection. Care trust showed a more pronounced effect on trust enhancement than competence trust. The present study also provides some practical measures for food safety supervisors to improve public trust in the national food inspection. Specifically, the sampling process should be open and transparent.

show abstract

Section: Measurement Modelmentioning

confidence: 77%

Chinese Consumers’ Trust in Food Safety Surveillance Sampling of Commonly Consumed Foods

Wang

Yang

Liang

et al. 2022

Foods

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

A Reliability Generalization Meta‐Analysis of the Kaufman Domains of Creativity Scale

Sen,

Yörük

2023

Journal of Creative Behavior

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Kaufman Domains of Creativity Scale (K‐DOCS) is a self‐reported rating scale that measures creative behaviors in five areas. Despite the vast amount of research on the scale, the internal consistency reliability of K‐DOCS scores have not been examined. Specifically, there is no study on the overall reliability coefficients, the variation in the reliability of scores, and reliability induction. In the present study, reliability generalization meta‐analyses were conducted to address these issues. The sample consisted of 56 studies that produced 60 Cronbach's alpha coefficients in total. The pooled alpha values were estimated to be .904 (total scale), .825 (Self/Everyday subscale), .858 (Scholarly subscale), .887 (Performance subscale), .867 (Scientific subscale), and .861 (Artistic subscale). The moderator analyses showed that the reliability estimates of K‐DOCS total scores and Self/Everyday subscale scores did not differ with respect to any of the moderator variables. On the other hand, certain variables affected the alpha coefficients for Scholarly (educational level, SD of the age, and mean age), Performance (continent, educational level, ethnicity, Caucasian percentage, SD of the age, and mean age), Scientific (language, test version, continent, country, ethnicity, SD of the age, and mean age), and Artistic (continent, language, country, mean age, and total mean score) subscale scores. Finally, the reliability induction rate was 39.62%, and there were no statistically significant differences between the inducing and reporting studies with respect to the continuous variables (mean of the total score, means and SDs of the sample age, and percentages of female and Caucasian). Our findings indicate that the K‐DOCS provides highly reliable scores. However, certain variables contribute to systematic errors in Scholarly, Performance, Scientific, and Artistic subscale scores. Hence, scores on these subscales should be interpreted with caution. Due to a high amount of variation in the reliability coefficients, reliability induction is not advised for the K‐DOCS.

show abstract

The impact of CIE education integrated with the BIG 6 teaching strategy on students’ innovative motivation, creativity, metacognition, and self-perceived employability

Chou

Shen

et al. 2023

Thinking Skills and Creativity

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Development and Validation of a Questionnaire to Assess Creative Potential Traits

Cited by 3 publications

References 89 publications

Chinese Consumers’ Trust in Food Safety Surveillance Sampling of Commonly Consumed Foods

Chinese Consumers’ Trust in Food Safety Surveillance Sampling of Commonly Consumed Foods

A Reliability Generalization Meta‐Analysis of the Kaufman Domains of Creativity Scale

The impact of CIE education integrated with the BIG 6 teaching strategy on students’ innovative motivation, creativity, metacognition, and self-perceived employability

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About