2021
DOI: 10.1186/s12871-021-01343-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and validation of a difficult laryngoscopy prediction model using machine learning of neck circumference and thyromental height

Abstract: Background Predicting difficult airway is challengeable in patients with limited airway evaluation. The aim of this study is to develop and validate a model that predicts difficult laryngoscopy by machine learning of neck circumference and thyromental height as predictors that can be used even for patients with limited airway evaluation. Methods Variables for prediction of difficulty laryngoscopy included age, sex, height, weight, body mass index, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the model can work at high sensitivity and low specificity (0.9079 and 0.4474) or low sensitivity and high specificity (0.3684 and 0.9605), exceeding the limits of low sensitivity of current tests. Kim et al ( 14 ) proposed a predictive model of difficult laryngoscopy, defined as Grade 3 and 4 by the Cormack-Lehane classification. In this monocentric study, Balanced Random Forest (BRF) algorithm showed the best performance with area under the receiver operating characteristics (AUROC) of 0.79 (0.72–0.86).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, the model can work at high sensitivity and low specificity (0.9079 and 0.4474) or low sensitivity and high specificity (0.3684 and 0.9605), exceeding the limits of low sensitivity of current tests. Kim et al ( 14 ) proposed a predictive model of difficult laryngoscopy, defined as Grade 3 and 4 by the Cormack-Lehane classification. In this monocentric study, Balanced Random Forest (BRF) algorithm showed the best performance with area under the receiver operating characteristics (AUROC) of 0.79 (0.72–0.86).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the model can work at high sensitivity and low specificity (0.9079 and 0.4474) or low sensitivity and high specificity (0.3684 and 0.9605), exceeding the limits of low sensitivity of current tests. Kim et al (14) proposed a predictive model of difficult laryngoscopy,…”
Section: Ai In Pre-operative Anesthesiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies using machine learning algorithms to predict difficult laryngoscopy, difficult airway or difficult intubation have reported high predictive power [27][28][29], but they all required indicators that should be evaluated by clinicians. In contrast, our method does not require any human evaluation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TMD, SMD, MO-IIG or neck circumference) -these latter magnitudes having been measured manually, as in the bedside screenings from current clinical practise. Works in this category include Yan et al [11] (who trained a Support Vector Machine), Langeron et al [12] (who employed Tree Boosting), Kim et al [13] (5 ML algorithms, among which Random Forests performed best), Yamanaka et al [14] (with an ensemble of 7 ML algorithms), or Zhou et al [15] (10 algorithms, with Gradient Boosting as their best).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%