2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10763-021-10170-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and Validation of a Cognitive Diagnostic Assessment with Ordered Multiple-Choice Items for Addition of Time

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The findings also indicated that NTCPS low-performing students performed significantly better in terms of process skills than NPS and NTTPS students. This is in line with the study by Chin et al ( 2022 ), Lim and Chan ( 1993 ), as well as Sia and Lim ( 2020 ). The strong computational skills of NTCPS low-performing students might result from the teachers’ practice in the mathematics classroom.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The findings also indicated that NTCPS low-performing students performed significantly better in terms of process skills than NPS and NTTPS students. This is in line with the study by Chin et al ( 2022 ), Lim and Chan ( 1993 ), as well as Sia and Lim ( 2020 ). The strong computational skills of NTCPS low-performing students might result from the teachers’ practice in the mathematics classroom.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…CDA is designed to measure students' specific knowledge structures and processing skills that cannot be directly observed, namely knowledge state or cognitive structure (Leighton & Gierl, 2007c), through which we can tell what cognitive attributes students have mastered or have not yet mastered. It can provide fine‐grained and individualized diagnostic information about students' learning, including individual student mastery of each attribute, so as to furnish meaningful feedback about students' strengths, weaknesses, and knowledge gaps in a given domain or skill and guide their learning process (Alves, 2012; Wu et al, 2012; Ye, 2005), based on which appropriate instructional strategies can be designed to tailored pupils' needs (Chin et al, 2022). There is great potential in providing remedial teaching strategies for students based on the results of cognitive diagnosis to promote students' learning, which is supported by a large number of studies (Ketterlin‐Geller & Yovanoff, 2009; Russell et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since it was reported in the 1980s, Cognitive Diagnostic Assessment (CDA) has attracted great interest, within the field of educational assessment (Haertel, 1989;Tatsuoka & Tatsuoka,1997;de la Torre, 2008;de la Torre et al, 2010;de la Torre & Minchen, 2014;Wang and Qiu 2019;Wu et al 2020;Chin 2021). Follow-up empirical studies in teaching and learning practice have provided evidence of the effectiveness of retrofitting large-scale test results, such as those from NAEP (de la Torre, 2008), SAT (Gierl et al, 2009) and PISA (Wu et al 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%