2013
DOI: 10.1002/acr.21854
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and Validation of a New Disease Activity Index as a Numerical Sum of Four Variables in Patients With Early Arthritis

Abstract: Objective. To describe the development and validation of a disease activity index in early arthritis that can be easily applied in daily practice and clinical research. Conclusion.The HUPI has face validity, is easy to calculate, is sensitive, and is a valid composite index for the assessment of disease activity in patients with early arthritis, both in clinical research and in routine care.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(37 reference statements)
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…HUPI was developed and validated in a mixed population of early RA and undifferentiated arthritis (UA) patients, the Princesa Early Arthritis Register Longitudinal study (PEARL) cohort [6], which we now use also to define cut-offs. In order to determine whether HUPI and its cut-offs are valid in long-term RA we added the data from the Estudio de la Morbilidad y Expresión Clínica de la Artritis Reumatoide (EMECAR) cohort [12].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…HUPI was developed and validated in a mixed population of early RA and undifferentiated arthritis (UA) patients, the Princesa Early Arthritis Register Longitudinal study (PEARL) cohort [6], which we now use also to define cut-offs. In order to determine whether HUPI and its cut-offs are valid in long-term RA we added the data from the Estudio de la Morbilidad y Expresión Clínica de la Artritis Reumatoide (EMECAR) cohort [12].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In relation to this strategy, there is substantial agreement on considering remission, or low disease activity, as the therapeutic objective for most patients with RA [1,2]. However, DAS28 and SDAI, the most widely-used indices for defining these targets, have several biases that may interfere with their accuracy [36]. DAS28 has the additional inconvenient that its values differ when it is calculated with either erytrosedimentation rate (ESR) or C-reactive protein (CRP) [7,8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations