2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2022.101043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and validation of a comprehensive early risk prediction model for patients with undifferentiated acute chest pain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(41 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For risk categorization in pathway 3, we assessed 2 risk scores, including the history, electrocardiogram, age, risk factors, and troponin (HEART) risk score, which has been validated for cohorts with suspected ACS in the prehospital setting, and the Early Chest Pain Admission Mortality and Myocardial Infarction (ECAMM) score, which is designed for undifferentiated chest pain presentations (rather than suspected ACS) but has not yet been prospectively validated . Risks of missing serious non-ACS diagnoses (eg, pulmonary embolism, heart failure, aortic dissection, pneumonia) are accounted for in a similar manner to standard ED pathways, with patients requiring classification as suspected ACS by paramedics and low-risk patients considered for prehospital discharge if clinical observations are normal (eMethods in Supplement 1), if pain has resolved, and after assessment by a virtual ED clinician.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For risk categorization in pathway 3, we assessed 2 risk scores, including the history, electrocardiogram, age, risk factors, and troponin (HEART) risk score, which has been validated for cohorts with suspected ACS in the prehospital setting, and the Early Chest Pain Admission Mortality and Myocardial Infarction (ECAMM) score, which is designed for undifferentiated chest pain presentations (rather than suspected ACS) but has not yet been prospectively validated . Risks of missing serious non-ACS diagnoses (eg, pulmonary embolism, heart failure, aortic dissection, pneumonia) are accounted for in a similar manner to standard ED pathways, with patients requiring classification as suspected ACS by paramedics and low-risk patients considered for prehospital discharge if clinical observations are normal (eMethods in Supplement 1), if pain has resolved, and after assessment by a virtual ED clinician.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Branch probabilities were estimated based on a systematic review of the literature (eMethods in Supplement 1) and using the Ambulance Victoria–linked chest pain cohort (Table 1). Given that the Ambulance Victoria chest pain cohort represented an undifferentiated chest pain cohort, we estimated the probability of patients undergoing a suspected ACS assessment pathway by dividing the myocardial infarction rate in the Ambulance Victoria cohort by the myocardial infarction rate in the Rapid Assessment of Possible Acute Coronary Syndrome in the Emergency Department With High-Sensitivity Troponin T Study (RAPID-TnT) cohort, an Australian trial that enrolled patients planned to undergo a suspected ACS pathway . Probabilities of patients being classified as low risk by either the ECAMM or HEART scores were determined by calculating these scores using Ambulance Victoria comprehensive clinical data .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Cost per capita per annum was estimated by dividing the total cost during the study period by the person-years at risk in Victoria, Australia, during the study period. To further understand the breakdown of estimated costs across the spectrum of chest pain presentations, we categorised patients according to the Early Chest pain Admission, Myocardial infarction, and Mortality (ECAMM) risk score,14which classifies risk of mortality, myocardial infarction and admission to the hospital for any cause among patients with undifferentiated chest pain and presented mean episode and total annual costs for each category. Risk scores available for suspected ACS (HEART score15 and EDACS score16) were not used, given the cohort represents patients with undifferentiated chest pain.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%