2018
DOI: 10.1097/jnr.0000000000000223
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and Validation of a Fertility Intention Scale in Breast Cancer Survivors

Abstract: The FIS has acceptable reliability, content validity, and construct validity. This scale is appropriate for use in research and clinical practice settings to evaluate the risk-benefit perceptions of pregnancy in patients with breast cancer.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The sample size was estimated by modeling the previously published study of fertility intention among breast cancer patients (Li et al, 2017). In that study, the M ± SD fertility intention score was 40.90 ± 11.42 after completing chemotherapy.…”
Section: Sample Size Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sample size was estimated by modeling the previously published study of fertility intention among breast cancer patients (Li et al, 2017). In that study, the M ± SD fertility intention score was 40.90 ± 11.42 after completing chemotherapy.…”
Section: Sample Size Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fertility intention was measured using the Fertility Intention Scale (FIS), which was developed by Li et al (). The Cronbach's alpha calculated for the FIS (15 items) was 0.88.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A previous study indicated that the mean score of Fertility Intention Scale (FIS) after treatment was 40.90 ± 11.42 (Li et al., ). Therefore, we assumed that the FIS score was normally distributed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Cronbach's alpha calculated for the FIS was .88. The reliability and validity of the FIS have been well established (Hsieh et al., ; Li et al., ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation