2006
DOI: 10.1139/f05-220
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and use of the Wetland Fish Index to assess the quality of coastal wetlands in the Laurentian Great Lakes

Abstract: Abstract:We use fish and environmental data from 40 wetlands of the Laurentian Great Lakes to develop the Wetland Fish Index (WFI), a tool that can be used to assess the quality of coastal marshes. A partial canonical correspondence analysis was used to ordinate fish species along multidimensional environmental axes that accounted for anthropogenic disturbance based on temperature, conductivity, and the presence of pollutants (e.g., suspended solids and primary nutrients). Compared with other measures of fish … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
59
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
4
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This approach relied on inferring that measurable biotic community attributes are responses to varying levels of anthropogenic disturbance. Since the 1980s, numerous organism-based indicators have been developed or evaluated for several Great Lakes ecosystem types, including coastal wetlands (Burton et al 1999;Herman et al 2001;Simon et al 2001;Wilcox et al 2002;Lougheed and Chow-Fraser 2002;Uzarski et al 2004Uzarski et al , 2005Uzarski et al , 2014Chow-Fraser 2006;Seilheimer and Chow-Fraser 2006;Albert et al 2007;Croft and Chow-Fraser 2007;Howe et al 2007a, b;Niemi et al 2007;Martínez-Crego et al 2010;Grabas et al 2012;Calabro et al 2013;Chin et al 2015). These indicators have been calibrated against both water chemistry attributes and anthropogenic land-use gradients to relate specific biological community characteristics to anthropogenic disturbances across the Great Lakes basin.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach relied on inferring that measurable biotic community attributes are responses to varying levels of anthropogenic disturbance. Since the 1980s, numerous organism-based indicators have been developed or evaluated for several Great Lakes ecosystem types, including coastal wetlands (Burton et al 1999;Herman et al 2001;Simon et al 2001;Wilcox et al 2002;Lougheed and Chow-Fraser 2002;Uzarski et al 2004Uzarski et al , 2005Uzarski et al , 2014Chow-Fraser 2006;Seilheimer and Chow-Fraser 2006;Albert et al 2007;Croft and Chow-Fraser 2007;Howe et al 2007a, b;Niemi et al 2007;Martínez-Crego et al 2010;Grabas et al 2012;Calabro et al 2013;Chin et al 2015). These indicators have been calibrated against both water chemistry attributes and anthropogenic land-use gradients to relate specific biological community characteristics to anthropogenic disturbances across the Great Lakes basin.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results from GLEI were intended to supplement and complement on-going efforts in indicator development within the Great Lakes region (e.g. Bertram and Stadler-Salt, 1998;Lawson, 2004;Environment Canada and U.S. EPA, 2005;Seilheimer and Chow-Fraser, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fish are a suitable group of organisms for monitoring aquatic condition because they have a documented relationship with environmental perturbations (i.e., increased trophic status and degraded fish community). Variation in environmental condition cause changes in the fish community and those changes can then be extracted into ecological indicators to quantify environmental impacts [19]. For best results, we recommend consistent sampling gear and fishing effort be used when collecting fish data for use with the WFI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To develop the WFI, each species was assigned U and T values according to the following equation [19].…”
Section: Wetland Fish Index (Wfi)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation