2022
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.791768
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and Study of Ezzence: A Modular Scent Wearable to Improve Wellbeing in Home Sleep Environments

Abstract: Ezzence is the first smartphone-controlled olfactometer designed for both day and night conditions. We discuss the design and technical implementation of Ezzence and report on a study to evaluate the feasibility of using the device in home-based sleep environments. The study results (N = 40) show that participants were satisfied with the device and found it easy to use. Furthermore, participants reported a significant improvement in sleep quality when using the device with scent in comparison to the control co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, shorter odor exposure may also affect sleep. In a pilot feasibility test of a smartphone-based olfactometer that can release scent after the phone detected sleep onset based on movement, subjects reported a significant subjective increase in sleep quality in the odor condition compared to no-scent condition ( Amores et al, 2022 ).…”
Section: Odor Modulation Of Sleepmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, shorter odor exposure may also affect sleep. In a pilot feasibility test of a smartphone-based olfactometer that can release scent after the phone detected sleep onset based on movement, subjects reported a significant subjective increase in sleep quality in the odor condition compared to no-scent condition ( Amores et al, 2022 ).…”
Section: Odor Modulation Of Sleepmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, the operational stability and repeatability of the OG were proved through the cyclic test for over 20 h. Through the operational performance tests and electrical power and structural dimension optimization of the OG, the superiority of the reporting OG over the reported or commercialized olfaction interfaces was certainly revealed (Table S1). , Compared to the reported smell-generating devices, the OG was apparently lightweight, small, wirelessly operated, and flexible, making it suitable for skin-integrated applications. At the same time, it presented a relatively rapid response time and a wide variety of odor options (24 in total) for achieving fast reactions against stimuli and high smell-generating efficiency.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the initial investment in these innovations would be signifcant, the open-sourced nature of the used technology (e.g. technologies used for the seatbelt [7] and fragrance [1] interventions) allows for potential cost savings, improvements, and broader accessibility.…”
Section: Discussion: Challenges and Lessons Learnedmentioning
confidence: 99%