2012
DOI: 10.1134/s106422931208008x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development And Structure Of Root Systems of Phleum pretense in monospecies cultures under the influence of the soil conditions and field management

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The high magnitude of the confidence intervals of the means for length, surface area and volume of the roots (Figures 2, 4, 5) indicated greater variability in the data also close to the soil surface, according to the facts that the roots are concentrated in this layer, and that the topsoil is where roots face greater vertical and horizontal variability of chemical, physical, and biological attributes in relation to subsurface layers [26]. Also, the soybean plant presents pivoting roots, from which lateral roots originate, and in the case of the minirhizotron, they may or may not reach the walls of the acrylic tubes for image capture, thus constituting a limitation and variability font for this kind of root study, creating an intrinsic variability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The high magnitude of the confidence intervals of the means for length, surface area and volume of the roots (Figures 2, 4, 5) indicated greater variability in the data also close to the soil surface, according to the facts that the roots are concentrated in this layer, and that the topsoil is where roots face greater vertical and horizontal variability of chemical, physical, and biological attributes in relation to subsurface layers [26]. Also, the soybean plant presents pivoting roots, from which lateral roots originate, and in the case of the minirhizotron, they may or may not reach the walls of the acrylic tubes for image capture, thus constituting a limitation and variability font for this kind of root study, creating an intrinsic variability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%