2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2022.122320
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and scale-up of oligo-dT monolithic chromatographic column for mRNA capture through understanding of base-pairing interactions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…DBCs around 7 mg pDNA per mL of column were consistent with expectations and literature data [11] for the smallest, 7.3 kbp large pAAV2/8 molecule. The DBCs of columns with flow channel diameters of 3 and 6 µm were expectedly lower in accordance with the reduction of the surface area (Table 2) of the monoliths with larger channels [29, 31].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…DBCs around 7 mg pDNA per mL of column were consistent with expectations and literature data [11] for the smallest, 7.3 kbp large pAAV2/8 molecule. The DBCs of columns with flow channel diameters of 3 and 6 µm were expectedly lower in accordance with the reduction of the surface area (Table 2) of the monoliths with larger channels [29, 31].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Porous poly dT media was reported to have a binding capacity of about 2–4 mg mRNA/mL (Mencin et al, 2023). To investigate the feasibility of in situ capping of poly dT‐tethered mRNA, the LiCl‐purified mRNA was mixed with poly dT at a binding ratio of 2 μg mRNA/μL, so that efficient mRNA adsorption would be ensured.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the capping reaction takes place inside the poly‐dT media, it is important to ensure highly efficient mRNA binding and enzymes entering into the pores of the media. It was reported that the poly‐dT media have an mRNA binding capacity of 2–4 mg/mL (Mencin et al, 2023), therefore, we then examined the in situ capping of poly dT‐tethered mRNA at four different mRNA/poly dT ratios of 1, 2, 3, and 4 μg‐mRNA/μL‐media. Figure 4b summarizes the results of mRNA binding/elution/capping efficiency and overall recovery.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike affinity chromatography where DBC does not differ between mRNA in IVT mixture and pre-purified mRNA because the ligand only binds the target molecule, lower binding capacity for mRNA from IVT with mixedmode PrimaS is likely due to weak competitive binding of charged impurities (NTPs, pDNA) to the PrimaS ligand. Further DBC increase could potentially still be achieved by adjusting binding conditions for mRNA such that all other impurities elute in flow-through, but we have not pursued further optimization as 5-7 mg/mL binding capacity is higher than average binding capacity reported for industrial affinity ligands for mRNA under standard conditions (2-4 mg/mL [19,31]).…”
Section: Dynamic Binding Capacitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Common mRNA purification techniques include traditional precipitation (e.g., by LiCl), tangential flow filtration (TFF) or liquid chromatography-based size exclusion, affinity, ion exchange, hydrophobic interaction and reverse-phase approaches, reviewed elsewhere [17]. The most industrially scalable chromatographic purification strategy for mRNA is affinity chromatography, utilizing the strong and selective interaction between 3′ polyadenylic acid (polyA) tail of mRNA with oligo-deoxythymidylic acid (Oligo dT) chain immobilized onto chromatographic supports [18,19]. Although highly selective, Oligo dT chromatography cannot be used for non-polyadenylated constructs, which can include a subclass of mRNA constructs requiring posttranscriptional polyadenylation, as well as circular RNA (circRNA) constructs, which are gaining attention due to increased in vivo stability compared to mRNA [20,21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%