Development and psychometric validation of the second version of the Coronary Artery Disease Education Questionnaire (CADE-Q II)

Ghisi, Gabriela Lima de Melo; Grace, Sherry L.; Thomas, Scott; Evans, Matt; Oh, Paul

doi:10.1016/j.pec.2014.11.019

Cited by 35 publications

(79 citation statements)

References 25 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…CFA was a modeling technique to confirm whether a proposed factorial structure could manifest the correlation or covariance of observable variables 41. The factorial structure of the original English version of CADEQ-II was established through exploratory factor analysis (EFA) 20. EFA revealed a four-factor structure, which explained 62% of the total variance 20.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The factorial structure of the original English version of CADEQ-II was established through exploratory factor analysis (EFA) 20. EFA revealed a four-factor structure, which explained 62% of the total variance 20. Therefore, in this study, CFA was conducted to test this four-factor model.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…CADEQ-II is the second version of the CADEQ 20. This instrument is developed based on a series of empirical researches conducted by Ghisi et al21–23 The scope of CADEQ-II covers almost all components of the cardiac care, including the psychosocial risks of CAD 20.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Also, it applies the “I do not know” option to avoid guessing 24. As a newly developed measurement, CADEQ-II has been validated in Canadian patients with CAD and has shown good reliability and validity 20. The Cronbach’s alpha was 0.91 for the whole questionnaire and was ranged from 0.65 to 0.77 for each domain.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

The Chinese version of the Coronary Artery Disease Education Questionnaire-II (CADEQ-II): translation and validation

Chen¹,

Geng²,

Wang³

et al. 2018

PPA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ObjectivesIt is necessary to assess disease-related knowledge in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) for tailored patient education; however there is a lack of a well-validated measurement in China. The objective of this study was to translate and validate a Chinese version of the Coronary Artery Disease Education Questionnaire-II (CADEQ-II).MethodsThe Chinese version of CADEQ-II was translated and culturally adapted. Then, it was tested for psychometric properties through a convenient sampling. Content validity was examined based on a panel of five experts. The item difficulty index and item discrimination index were calculated to assess the item difficulty and item discrimination. Internal consistency reliability was measured with the Cronbach’s alpha coefficient. Criterion-related validity was established through comparing scores in patients with different education levels. Construct validity was assessed through confirmatory factor analysis (CFA).ResultsThe Chinese version of the CADEQ-II was finalized after deleting three items and modifying two items from the original version. Three hundred and sixteen participants completed the whole questionnaire. Content validity index of the whole questionnaire was 0.87. The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of the overall questionnaire was 0.907. The significant difference of the knowledge scores among patients with different education levels supported criterion-related validity. CFA confirmed the proposed four-factorial structure of the questionnaire.ConclusionThe Chinese version of CADEQ-II had an acceptable reliability and validity among Chinese patients with CAD. It could be used to develop individualized health education for Chinese patients with CAD. Also, it could serve as a suitable outcome measurement to evaluate the effectiveness of education interventions related to CAD.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

The Chinese version of the Coronary Artery Disease Education Questionnaire-II (CADEQ-II): translation and validation

Chen¹,

Geng²,

Wang³

et al. 2018

PPA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Knowledge was assessed pre-and post-CR using the coronary artery disease education questionnaire (CADE-QII) [41], which assesses patients' knowledge in 5 domains: their medical condition, risk factors, exercise, nutrition, and psychosocial risk (item stems shown in Table 3). Each of the 31 items has 4 response options, of which one is most correct (scored 3), one is somewhat accurate (scored 1), and two are incorrect (scored 0).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Behavior determinants among cardiac rehabilitation patients receiving educational interventions: An application of the health action process approach

Ghisi

Grace

Thomas

et al. 2015

Patient Education and Counseling

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Trust me, it is valid: Research validity in pharmacy education research

Cor

2016

Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Development and psychometric validation of the second version of the Coronary Artery Disease Education Questionnaire (CADE-Q II)

Abstract: This tool may be useful to assess CR participants' knowledge gaps, and to evaluate the efficacy of educational delivery in CR.

Cited by 35 publications

References 25 publications

The Chinese version of the Coronary Artery Disease Education Questionnaire-II (CADEQ-II): translation and validation

The Chinese version of the Coronary Artery Disease Education Questionnaire-II (CADEQ-II): translation and validation

Behavior determinants among cardiac rehabilitation patients receiving educational interventions: An application of the health action process approach

Trust me, it is valid: Research validity in pharmacy education research

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About