2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2015.12.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and psychometric testing of the Carter Assessment of Critical Thinking in Midwifery (Preceptor/Mentor version)

Abstract: given the importance of critical thinking skills for midwifery practice, mapping and assessing critical thinking development in students׳ practice across an undergraduate programme is vital. The CACTiM (Preceptor/Mentor version) has utility for clinical education, research and practice. The tool can inform and guide preceptors׳ assessment of students׳ critical thinking in practice. The availability of a reliable and valid tool can be used to research the development of critical thinking in practice.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…61,81,84 In the more recent medical literature, there was an increasing emphasis on the role of context and patient preferences as part of the reasoning process. 33,44,64,[85][86][87] In the nursing literature, related terms were critical thinking [88][89][90][91][92][93][94][95][96] and clinical reasoning. The outcomes of reasoning in nursing focus on competence 97,98 and establishing a nursing plan of care.…”
Section: [Hd2]synopses Of Clinical Reasoning By Disciplinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…61,81,84 In the more recent medical literature, there was an increasing emphasis on the role of context and patient preferences as part of the reasoning process. 33,44,64,[85][86][87] In the nursing literature, related terms were critical thinking [88][89][90][91][92][93][94][95][96] and clinical reasoning. The outcomes of reasoning in nursing focus on competence 97,98 and establishing a nursing plan of care.…”
Section: [Hd2]synopses Of Clinical Reasoning By Disciplinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…http://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1346847 Bunterm, T., Lee, K., Ng Lan Kong, J., Srikoon, S., Vangpoomyai, P., Rattanavongsa, J., & Rachahoon, G. (2014 1937-1959. http://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.886347 Carmichael, E., & Farrell, H. (2012 Carter, A. G., Creedy, D. K., & Sidebotham, M. (2016).…”
Section: Interventionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Psychometric testing confirmed the reliability and validity of the tools in measuring critical thinking skills in midwifery practice (Carter et al, 2016b, Carter et al, 2017a, Carter et al, 2017b. Further testing of matched responses for participating students on the three tools also indicated good reliability and concurrent validity (Carter et al, 2017c).…”
Section: Establish Concurrent Validity Of the Three New Toolsmentioning
confidence: 65%