2018
DOI: 10.1080/01612840.2018.1463325
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and Psychometric Testing of the Suicidal Recovery Ability Scale (SRAS) for Assessing Individuals Who Have Attempted Suicide

Abstract: Assessing the recovery ability of individuals who have attempted suicide is crucial for psychiatric health nurses. The purpose of this study was to develop and test a psychometric Suicidal Recovery Ability Scale (SRAS). Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) indicated that three subscales with 15 items best fit the data. The global SRAS score showed significant negative correlation with the Beck Hopelessness Scale (BHS) score. The Cronbach's α and test-retest reliability scores for the global SRAS and the subscale… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The SRAS developed by Sun et al 19 has satisfactory psychometric properties in measuring suicide recovery ability. It is a 15-item questionnaire that measures 3 factors of suicide recovery, namely: (1) Self-awareness of the value of life; (2) Utilization of coping strategies; and (3) Efforts being exerted to live a normal and satisfying life.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The SRAS developed by Sun et al 19 has satisfactory psychometric properties in measuring suicide recovery ability. It is a 15-item questionnaire that measures 3 factors of suicide recovery, namely: (1) Self-awareness of the value of life; (2) Utilization of coping strategies; and (3) Efforts being exerted to live a normal and satisfying life.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Suicide Recovery Ability Scale. The SRAS developed by Sun et al 19 21 The SPS was also used as a screening tool in selecting the participants.…”
Section: Research Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%