2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.nedt.2017.12.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and psychometric testing of a Clinical Reasoning Evaluation Simulation Tool (CREST) for assessing nursing students' abilities to recognize and respond to clinical deterioration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
44
0
4

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
44
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, the mean student SCT score (57.8 to 58.9) and the mean expert SCT score (83.3) in our study are similar to those previously described in the literature, which suggests that our use of SCTs was correct [43]. In addition, self-assessment was equally used to assess the various steps of the nursing clinical reasoning process but this part is less validated, as it rests on student's perception only [20,24,39,47].…”
Section: Limitationssupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nevertheless, the mean student SCT score (57.8 to 58.9) and the mean expert SCT score (83.3) in our study are similar to those previously described in the literature, which suggests that our use of SCTs was correct [43]. In addition, self-assessment was equally used to assess the various steps of the nursing clinical reasoning process but this part is less validated, as it rests on student's perception only [20,24,39,47].…”
Section: Limitationssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…This tool explores the process by which nurses collect information, process the information, identify problems/issues, establish goals, take action, and evaluate outcomes. Recently, and after the beginning of our study, Liaw et al published a study describing another specific tool used to assess clinical reasoning in clinical deterioration which, on the whole, used the same criteria as our own study [47]. The weaknesses in the previous literature as well as the neutral results (including ours) could be explained by the difficulty to assess clinical reasoning, the complexity of education, and the need to explore results in the long-term.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…The researcher developed three vignettes of PPH. The five-point scale developed by Liaw et al (2018) with the description of each score was used. The potential scores ranged from 12-60.…”
Section: Clinical Reasoningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Além de ser uma ferramenta de avaliação, o Clinical Reasoning Evaluation Simulation Tool (CREST) é um guia para fornecer feedback sobre o desempenho do raciocínio clínico dos estudantes. para avaliar as habilidades de raciocínio clinico de estudantes de enfermagem do 2 e 3 ano e utiliza pesquisadores internacionais (LIAW et al, 2018). MATIA et al (2019) validam um instrumento de avaliação que permite identificar fragilidades no processo de ensino aprendizagem e apontaram que um formato de avaliação claro e objetivo tanto para professores e estudantes contribuem para desmistificar o processo avaliativo e amenizar os desafios da avaliação da competência no ensino superior nas áreas da saúde.…”
Section: Resultsunclassified