2020
DOI: 10.1101/2020.04.24.20077776
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and potential usefulness of the COVID-19 Ag Respi-Strip® diagnostic assay in a pandemic context

Abstract: Introduction: COVID-19 Ag Respi-Strip, an immunochromatographic (ICT) assay for the rapid detection of SARS-CoV-2 antigen on nasopharyngeal specimen, has been developed to identify positive COVID-19 patients allowing prompt clinical and quarantine decisions. In this Original Research article, we describe the conception, the analytical and clinical performances as well as the risk management of implementing the COVID-19 Ag Respi-Strip in a diagnostic decision algorithm. Materials and Methods: Development of the… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Under routine conditions, the sensitivity of the antigen detection of SARS-CoV-2 with the immunochromatographic COVID-19 Ag Respi-Strip kit was significantly lower than that announced by the manufacturer or reported by Vandenberg [2], although we limited ourselves to using qRT-PCR as the comparison method. In our series, we observed a median sensitivity of 23.9 %.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Under routine conditions, the sensitivity of the antigen detection of SARS-CoV-2 with the immunochromatographic COVID-19 Ag Respi-Strip kit was significantly lower than that announced by the manufacturer or reported by Vandenberg [2], although we limited ourselves to using qRT-PCR as the comparison method. In our series, we observed a median sensitivity of 23.9 %.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The WHO estimates that at least half of COVID-19-infected patients might be missed by such tests and therefore does not currently recommend their use. Vandenberg calculated their performance based on a threshold cycle (Ct) below 22 [2]. In the meantime, a notice from the manufacturer signalled that some hospitals observed negative results with a Ct of 13.45 or positive results with a Ct higher than 33, underlining the unclear relationship between protein and RNA detection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation