2020 8th IEEE RAS/EMBS International Conference for Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (BioRob) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/biorob49111.2020.9224302
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and Pilot Evaluation of the ArmTracker: A Wearable System to Monitor Arm Kinematics During Daily Life

Abstract: Wearable sensing technology is proving useful for promoting health and fitness for the general public and athletes, yet few devices are tailored to people with movement impairments. For devices targeting home-based rehabilitation, it is crucial to have robust and non-obtrusive sensors capable of measuring activity for long periods of time outside of a laboratory environment. Studies focusing on continuous monitoring of arm activity during daily life over weeks or months only use IMU sensors or accelerometers a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
(13 reference statements)
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this regard, 18 studies in total have reported a home-based assessment or treatment (37% of included studies in clinical population and general design categories). The common element in these studies is preparation and utilization of a convenient wearable platform for subjects in the form of a glove [35]; a band, strap, or watch [25-28, 31, 33, 43, 44, 98], a sleeve [29], and a shirt [47][48][49]53]. On the other hand, only five studies (7%) have assessed the comfortability of their wearable systems in subjects through methods such as questionnaires [25,79] and interviews [62,79].…”
Section: General Wearable Design/performance Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this regard, 18 studies in total have reported a home-based assessment or treatment (37% of included studies in clinical population and general design categories). The common element in these studies is preparation and utilization of a convenient wearable platform for subjects in the form of a glove [35]; a band, strap, or watch [25-28, 31, 33, 43, 44, 98], a sleeve [29], and a shirt [47][48][49]53]. On the other hand, only five studies (7%) have assessed the comfortability of their wearable systems in subjects through methods such as questionnaires [25,79] and interviews [62,79].…”
Section: General Wearable Design/performance Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%