Development and performance evaluation of an ultralow flow nanoliquid chromatography‐tandem mass spectrometry set‐up

Abstract

LC-MS/MS is the most commonly used technique for the identification and characterization of proteins. The efficiency of the electrospray process is a critical factor in LC-MS/MS. Despite the benefits associated with very low flow rates for the ionization efficiency, most LC-MS/MS platforms are operated at relatively high flow rates. The purpose of this work was to develop a nano LC system operable at a flow rate of 20 nL/min, applicable for routine analysis in proteomics laboratories. Peptide separation was performed with an analytical column packed with 2 μm porous chromatographic beads, a length of 25 cm and an inner diameter (i.d.) of 25 μm. Practical usability, reproducibility, and overall performance of the system were evaluated with a tryptic peptide mixture generated from HeLa cells. Using 100 ng of sample, we identified on average 3721 protein groups based on 25,699 peptides. We demonstrate that the number of peptides identified with this system increases with decreasing flow rates. Probing the sensitivity of the set-up we analyzed only 10 ng of the sample, identifying an average number of 2042 protein groups based on 11 424 peptides. All MS data have been deposited in the ProteomeXchange with identifier PXD000396 (http://proteomecentral.proteomexchange.org/dataset/PXD000396).

Exosome cofactor hMTR4 competes with export adaptor ALYREF to ensure balanced nuclear RNA pools for degradation and export

“…Considering that hMTR4 competes with ALYREF for binding with CBC/RNAs, how do cells ensure specific recruitment of hMTR4 to "export-defective" RNAs, but not export-sufficient RNAs? As previously reported, we found that the protein abundance of ALYREF is~5 times more than that of hMTR4 in HeLa cells (Kocher et al, 2014; Appendix Fig S5). As most of hMTR4 is concentrated in the nucleolus, the nucleoplasmic concentration of hMTR4 must be even less than ALYREF.…”

Now, More Than Ever, Proteomics Needs Better Chromatography

“…Many improved and alternative approaches have been introduced in the last years, including capillary electrophoresis (Fonslow & Yates, 2009), superficially porous and sub-micron particles (Blue & Jorgenson, 2015), use of slower flow rates (Köcher et al, 2014), HPLC systems with higher-pressure capabilities ( i.e. , > 20,000 psi) (Shen et al, 2005), and monolithic columns (Iwasaki et al, 2012; Horie et al, 2014; Zhang et al, 2015), among others.…”

An overview to nano‐scale analytical techniques: Nano‐liquid chromatography and capillary electrochromatography

“…These two microfluidic techniques have been successfully used for the separation of a large number of compounds including peptides, proteins, enantiomers, drugs, herbicides, pollutants, hormones, estrogens, nutraceuticals, etc. .…”