2018 12th International Conference on Sensing Technology (ICST) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/icsenst.2018.8603628
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and Optimization of PID Control for FES Knee Exercise in Hemiplegic Rehabilitation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…error e(t) P I The PID controller has been widely used in FES control studies as a benchmark comparison to other control algorithms (Boudville et al, 2018;Qiu et al, 2014;Wannawas et al, 2022). Here, we use heuristics to hand tune the PID parameters one at a time, particularly focusing on the response to a single pulse.…”
Section: Pid Controllermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…error e(t) P I The PID controller has been widely used in FES control studies as a benchmark comparison to other control algorithms (Boudville et al, 2018;Qiu et al, 2014;Wannawas et al, 2022). Here, we use heuristics to hand tune the PID parameters one at a time, particularly focusing on the response to a single pulse.…”
Section: Pid Controllermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PID feedback controller was chosen as a comparator for consistency with other papers on advanced FES control. Although PID controllers have generally been shown to under perform in comparison to other more intelligent and adaptive control techniques (Boudville et al, 2018;Qiu et al, 2014;Wannawas, Shafti, & Faisal, 2022), it is common practice to compare developed FES control algorithms to the basic PID controller as a benchmark. There are numerous other control algorithms that have been applied to FES control, making the choice of controller to use in comparisons difficult and somewhat arbitrary, so we choose to use a PID controller for comparison, as is standard.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An accurate simulation model incorporating the non-linear effects of muscles is also necessary to guarantee the performance of the controller [8]. Several feedback controllers, such as proportional-integral-derivative (PID) [9], fuzzy logic [10], neural network [11] and adaptive controllers [3], have been proposed. However, the proposed feedback control system demonstrates a decline in control performance in the presence of non-linearities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, applying a pre-specified stimulation pattern in openloop FES systems cannot obtain the proper performance. To solve the problem, researches have proposed many control strategies of single-joint movement (eg, ankle, or knee joints) (3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9) and multi-joint motion (eg, cycling, standing, or walking) (10)(11)(12)(13). The proposed methods included adaptive feedback control (14), fuzzy control (5,15), PID control (4,16), neural control (17), sliding mode control (5,6,18), gain scheduling (8), nonlinear model predictive control (9,19,20), and so on.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%