1988
DOI: 10.1117/12.968786
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development And Operational Evaluation Of PACS Network At Georgetown University

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Multiple institutions shared their PACS implementation experiences including the University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA), Georgetown University, the University of Pennsylvania, the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Washington University at St. Louis Mallinckrodt Institute, Kyoto University Japan, Victoria Hospital Canada, Toshiba Corporation, and the US Army. 124 135 The ACR-NEMA Standard Committee that included representatives from academia and industry (eg, Philips Medical Systems; Picker Medical Systems; NEMA; Siemens Medical Systems, US; New York University; Bio-Imaging Research, Inc.; Reality Technologies; Digital Equipment Corp; Veteran’s Administration Medical Center) reported on updates, and implementations using the standard were described. 136 140 Several papers detailed image archiving, 141 146 and two papers discussed the important concept of interfacing hospital information systems and/or radiology operations/information systems with PACS.…”
Section: ’S Pacs Conferencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple institutions shared their PACS implementation experiences including the University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA), Georgetown University, the University of Pennsylvania, the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Washington University at St. Louis Mallinckrodt Institute, Kyoto University Japan, Victoria Hospital Canada, Toshiba Corporation, and the US Army. 124 135 The ACR-NEMA Standard Committee that included representatives from academia and industry (eg, Philips Medical Systems; Picker Medical Systems; NEMA; Siemens Medical Systems, US; New York University; Bio-Imaging Research, Inc.; Reality Technologies; Digital Equipment Corp; Veteran’s Administration Medical Center) reported on updates, and implementations using the standard were described. 136 140 Several papers detailed image archiving, 141 146 and two papers discussed the important concept of interfacing hospital information systems and/or radiology operations/information systems with PACS.…”
Section: ’S Pacs Conferencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Main issues taken into account are [5]: costs of equipment, personnel, materials and archiving; dependence of such parameters on time required to perform actions; analysis of trend of diagnostic imaging examinations (digital vs. analog).…”
Section: Pacs Evaluation Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%