2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.mechatronics.2010.08.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and model-based transparency analysis of an Internet-distributed hardware-in-the-loop simulation platform

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A negative aspect of distributed simulation is that delays are introduced which is an undesired property. The combination of distributed systems with real-time requirements present a particular challenge and techniques have been developed to deal with such set-ups in (Goodell et al 2006) and (Ersal et al 2011).…”
Section: Distributed Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A negative aspect of distributed simulation is that delays are introduced which is an undesired property. The combination of distributed systems with real-time requirements present a particular challenge and techniques have been developed to deal with such set-ups in (Goodell et al 2006) and (Ersal et al 2011).…”
Section: Distributed Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The purpose of such a setup is to try to improve the driving experience in Sim III and at the same time the vehicle mounted in the chassis dynamometer is experiencing more realistic loads due to that the driver's perception of the simulation is closer to reality. Previous work used an internet-distributed hardware-in-the-loop simulation of an engine test bench and a ride motion simulator (Ersal et al, 2011). The co-simulation is made possible with the development of a pedal robot that actuates the driver's input in the moving base simulator to the mounted vehicle.…”
Section: Test Platforms For Evaluation Of Vehiclesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Data.mdb central database is a Microsoft Access file containing the Schedule Database and Resource Database. Figure 3 shows the Target Application Architecture, which enables the system to be both modular and turn-key, qualities that are missing in the current state-of-the-art brought in the literature Emami, 2008, 2011) (Ersal, et al, 2011) (Singaraju, et al, 2006). This architecture is composed of three interconnected subsystems: Target PC, Hardware-in-the-loop Platform and Manufacture Supplied Test Motors, and is the interface between the virtual Server Software Application and the physical Motor Test Platform hardware.…”
Section: Server Software Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The University of Michigan and TARDEC connected two distinct HIL systems via the Internet to evaluate automotive powertrain systems (Ersal, et al, 2011). The University of Alaska Fairbanks developed a HIL simulation of a PUMA 560 that was remotely accessible, enabling the remote development of control algorithms (Singaraju, et al, 2006).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%