2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0191-8869(99)00262-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and initial validation of validity scales for the NEO-Five Factor Inventory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
11
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
11
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Neuroticism and Extraversion-Neuroticism and extraversion were assessed in the initial questionnaire via the 12 neuroticism items and the 12 extraversion items drawn from the NEO Five Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI: Costa and McCrae, 1992;Scandell, 2000). Participants rated their agreement with each statement on a 5-point scale (with 1 = Strongly disagree, 3 = Neutral, and 5 = Strongly agree).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Neuroticism and Extraversion-Neuroticism and extraversion were assessed in the initial questionnaire via the 12 neuroticism items and the 12 extraversion items drawn from the NEO Five Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI: Costa and McCrae, 1992;Scandell, 2000). Participants rated their agreement with each statement on a 5-point scale (with 1 = Strongly disagree, 3 = Neutral, and 5 = Strongly agree).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A mean score for each participant for each day was calculated by taking the mean of every item that was attempted that day, and these daily means then were used to compute an overall mean daily HAQ scores for each participant across the 30 days of diaries. In this sample, the coefficient alpha for the mean scores on the 10 HAQ items, averaged over time, was .96.Neuroticism and Extraversion-Neuroticism and extraversion were assessed in the initial questionnaire via the 12 neuroticism items and the 12 extraversion items drawn from the NEO Five Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI: Costa and McCrae, 1992;Scandell, 2000). Participants rated their agreement with each statement on a 5-point scale (with 1 = Strongly disagree, 3 = Neutral, and 5 = Strongly agree).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Higher scores reflect higher levels of the temperament characteristics that the scale measures. Discriminant and convergent validity of the NEO scales has been demonstrated in previous studies Scandell, 2000). The NEO scales have also been shown to have high levels of internal consistency Loukas et al, 2000).…”
mentioning
confidence: 52%
“…Dažniausiai penkių didžiųjų faktorių matavimui naudojamo modelio NEO-PI yra sukurtos dvi versijos (Scandell 2000):…”
Section: Penkių Didžiųjų Faktorių Matavimo Metodaiunclassified
“…− NEO-FFI (NEO Five-Factor Inventory) -60 punktų NEO inventorius, įvertinantis tik penkis didžiuosius faktorius (Scandell 2000;Schmidt et al 1999). Kadangi NEO PI-R tyrimams dažniausiai yra per ilgas, buvo sukurtas šis trumpesnis variantas.…”
Section: Penkių Didžiųjų Faktorių Matavimo Metodaiunclassified