2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2009.09.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and initial psychometric properties of the Computer Assisted Maltreatment Inventory (CAMI): A comprehensive self-report measure of child maltreatment history

Abstract: The present findings as well as the rich descriptive data and flexibility offered by computer administration suggest that the CAMI is a promising instrument for the comprehensive assessment of maltreatment history from adults.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
57
0
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(41 reference statements)
5
57
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The presence of certain features of the events, empirically determined to be indicative of greater severity of CPA or exposure to IPV (i.e., frequency of the acts, nature of the acts, duration of the acts, whether injury resulted from the acts, whether medical attention was sought, the number of and relationship to the perpetrator[s] who committed the acts, the location of the participant during the acts), are assigned a weighted score reflecting abuse severity. The CAMI has strong internal consistency and test-retest reliability (DiLillo et al, 2010). The developers also report good criterion-related validity when compared with the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (Bernstein & Fink, 1998), another widely used measure of child maltreatment (DiLillo et al, 2010).…”
Section: Computer Assisted Maltreatment Inventorymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The presence of certain features of the events, empirically determined to be indicative of greater severity of CPA or exposure to IPV (i.e., frequency of the acts, nature of the acts, duration of the acts, whether injury resulted from the acts, whether medical attention was sought, the number of and relationship to the perpetrator[s] who committed the acts, the location of the participant during the acts), are assigned a weighted score reflecting abuse severity. The CAMI has strong internal consistency and test-retest reliability (DiLillo et al, 2010). The developers also report good criterion-related validity when compared with the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (Bernstein & Fink, 1998), another widely used measure of child maltreatment (DiLillo et al, 2010).…”
Section: Computer Assisted Maltreatment Inventorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CAMI has strong internal consistency and test-retest reliability (DiLillo et al, 2010). The developers also report good criterion-related validity when compared with the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (Bernstein & Fink, 1998), another widely used measure of child maltreatment (DiLillo et al, 2010).…”
Section: Computer Assisted Maltreatment Inventorymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Sexual and Physical Abuse subscales include screening questions that correspond to commonly used definitions of each form of maltreatment; positively endorsed screening items are followed by a more detailed assessment of specific characteristics of the abuse (see DiLillo et al, 2009). From these responses, severity scores are derived for each form of maltreatment, reflecting the sum of six severity indicators selected for their ability to predict poor long-term outcomes for maltreatment victims (e.g., for sexual abuse, these indicators are nature, frequency, and duration of abusive acts; use of physical force; relationship to perpetrator; and number of perpetrators).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CAMI (DiLillo et al, 2009;DiLillo et al, 2006) is a Web-based, self-report questionnaire designed to assess childhood maltreatment experiences, including sexual abuse, physical abuse, psychological abuse, neglect, and witnessing domestic violence. For the purposes of the current study, only the sexual abuse scale was used because of the consistent links between CSA and revictimization.…”
Section: Computer Assisted Maltreatment Inventory (Cami)mentioning
confidence: 99%