2016
DOI: 10.2146/ajhp160185
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and implementation of a pharmacist-run comprehensive medication review program in Wisconsin

Abstract: A pharmacist-run CMR program helped to elevate the role of the community pharmacist in a health system and to improve patient exposure to CMRs. Sustaining a centralized CMR program requires support from other members of the health-system team so that pharmacists can spend more time providing patient care and less time on the technical tasks involved.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Comprehensive medication review (CMR) is a service offered to patients in order to optimize their medication regimens to help prevent potential adverse drug reactions and improve their overall disease management [5]. Several studies have been published looking at the perception of CMR for both patients and providers alike which indicate an overall positive reaction to the services when available [5][6][7]. While CMR services are well received, there have only been a handful of studies looking at the effectiveness of the programs on elderly patient outcomes [8][9][10][11][12].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comprehensive medication review (CMR) is a service offered to patients in order to optimize their medication regimens to help prevent potential adverse drug reactions and improve their overall disease management [5]. Several studies have been published looking at the perception of CMR for both patients and providers alike which indicate an overall positive reaction to the services when available [5][6][7]. While CMR services are well received, there have only been a handful of studies looking at the effectiveness of the programs on elderly patient outcomes [8][9][10][11][12].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%