Development and Implementation of a Medical Oncology Quality Improvement Tool for a Regional Community Oncology Network: The Fox Chase Cancer Center Partners Initiative

Abstract

Fox Chase Cancer Center Partners (FCCCP) is a community hospital/academic partnership consisting of 25 hospitals in the Delaware Valley. Originally created in 1986, FCCCP promotes quality community cancer care through education, quality assurance, and access to clinical trial research. An important aspect of quality assurance is a yearly medical oncology audit that benchmarks quality indicators and guidelines and provides a roadmap for quality improvement initiatives in the community oncology clinical office setting. Each year, the FCCCP team and the Partner Medical Oncologists build disease site- and stage-specific indicators based on National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. Concordance with multiple indicators is assessed on 20 charts from each community practice. A report for each FCCCP medical oncology practice summarizes documentation, screening recommendations, new drug use, and research trends in a particular disease site. Descriptive statistics reflect indicators met, number of new cases seen per year, number of disease site cases from tumor registry information, and clinical trial accrual total. Education and documentation tools are provided to physicians and oncology office nursing staff. The FCCCP Clinical Operations Team, consisting of medical oncologists and oncology-certified nurses, has conducted quality audits in medical oncology offices for 7 years using NCCN-derived indicators. Successful audits comprising gastric, colorectal, and breast cancer have been the focus of recent evaluations. For the 2005 stage II/III breast cancer evaluation, mean compliance per parameter was 88%, with 15 of 16 practices achieving mean compliance greater than 80%. A large-scale quality assurance audit in a community cancer partner network is feasible. Recent evaluation of localized breast cancer shows high compliance with guidelines and identifies areas for focused education. Partnership between academic and community oncologists produces a quality review process that is broadly applicable and adaptable to changing medical knowledge.

Validation of the PIII CLI risk score for the prediction of amputation-free survival in patients undergoing infrainguinal autogenous vein bypass for critical limb ischemia

“…Once identified, these processes could be promoted and implemented elsewhere in order to improve the overall quality of care for the CLI population. Similar efforts have been applied successfully in a variety of other disease states such as cancer, 22 MI, 23 CAD, 24 and peripheral arterial disease. 25 …”

Factors associated with death 1 year after lower extremity bypass in Northern New England

“…This model has been used effectively in cardiac surgery, 12,13 myocardial infarction care, 14,15 in the treatment of pulmonary disease, 16 and cancer. 17 In addition to these ongoing efforts in quality improvement in LEB surgery, we are applying similar strategies in improving results after carotid endarterectomy in our region. 9 But in determining the risk-adjusted outcomes after LEB, which is the best parameter by which to measure success?…”

The Florida Initiative for Quality Cancer Care: A Regional Project to Measure and Improve Cancer Care

“…Stimulated by the board's report, a number of initiatives for quality of care have been implemented by several national organizations and institutions (Table 1). [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] An example of an early effort is the National Initiative for Cancer Care Quality (NICCQ) sponsored by the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), 2 the results of which were published in 2004. 3 This project developed 36 quality measures for breast cancer and 25 quality measures for colorectal cancer based on literature review and expert opinion.…”