2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2019.113736
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and evaluation of silver amplification immunochromatography kit for foot-and-mouth disease virus antigen detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…26 Output signal-amplification techniques augment the performance of LFIAs by increasing their sensitivity. 39,40 Our antigen-detection assays can be expected to perform as a clinical diagnostic tool. By detecting cultured SARS-CoV-2 particles as low as 6.3 3 10 4 copies/mL, our LFIA was more sensitive than other commercially available antigen-detection kits.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…26 Output signal-amplification techniques augment the performance of LFIAs by increasing their sensitivity. 39,40 Our antigen-detection assays can be expected to perform as a clinical diagnostic tool. By detecting cultured SARS-CoV-2 particles as low as 6.3 3 10 4 copies/mL, our LFIA was more sensitive than other commercially available antigen-detection kits.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The safety and efficiency of DHG have been tested and verified by proven historical facts, but gelatins made from other animal skins may have unpredictable and serious consequences [2][3][4]. For example, it has been indicated that cattle-hide gelatins (CHGs) may cause safety problems because of the risk of bovine spongiform encephalopathy and foot-and-mouth disease [5,6]. Pig-hide gelatins (PHGs) may present religious conflicts since the use of porcine foods and drugs is forbidden for people in some Islamic countries [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%