2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2018.09.055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and evaluation of semi-destructive, ultrasound assisted extraction method followed by gas chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry enabling discrimination of red lipstick samples

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For comparison of results, two different approaches were applied. In the case of ATR‐FTIR and UAE/GC‐MS, the correlation coefficient (CC) was used followed by visual analysis (details in [25] and [26]), whereas in analyzing of the CE results a only visual comparison of the electropherograms was performed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…For comparison of results, two different approaches were applied. In the case of ATR‐FTIR and UAE/GC‐MS, the correlation coefficient (CC) was used followed by visual analysis (details in [25] and [26]), whereas in analyzing of the CE results a only visual comparison of the electropherograms was performed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A reference sample – lipstick L34 – was provided for comparative analysis. The reference sample was prepared on a specially designed and 3D‐printed stand described in our previous publication [26]. Additionally, since it was a liquid lipstick, the chemical composition of which takes time to stabilize when applied to the substrate, a special approach was used.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations