2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jddst.2016.10.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and evaluation of insulin-loaded cationic solid lipid nanoparticles for oral delivery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is likely that the combination or synergistic action of all these effects is the cause of the large increase in oral BA associated with lipid nanovehicles and, in turn, of the increasing trend in the selection of this route of administration for SLN/NLC (see Figure 4). Furthermore, due to all the previously described effects, lipid-based NP have been examined for the oral delivery of peptide therapeutics, such as salmon calcitonin (Chen et al, 2013;Fan et al, 2014) and insulin (Hecq et al, 2016;Xu et al, 2018;Alsulays et al, 2019).…”
Section: Oral Routementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is likely that the combination or synergistic action of all these effects is the cause of the large increase in oral BA associated with lipid nanovehicles and, in turn, of the increasing trend in the selection of this route of administration for SLN/NLC (see Figure 4). Furthermore, due to all the previously described effects, lipid-based NP have been examined for the oral delivery of peptide therapeutics, such as salmon calcitonin (Chen et al, 2013;Fan et al, 2014) and insulin (Hecq et al, 2016;Xu et al, 2018;Alsulays et al, 2019).…”
Section: Oral Routementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, various nanocarrier systems have been extensively investigated in oral delivery of biologics including PPs, vaccines and nucleic acids. According to materials of nanocarriers, there are primarily three categories of nanoparticles, such as polymeric, lipid-based and inorganic nanoparticles, some of which have demonstrated good delivery effect for PPs by oral routes ( Table 4 106 , 120 , 217 , 219 , 225 , 290 , 291 , 292 , 293 , 294 , 295 , 296 , 297 , 298 , 299 , 300 , 301 , 302 , 303 , 304 , 305 , 306 , 307 , 308 , 309 , 310 , 311 ).…”
Section: Current Strategies Towards Enhancement Of the Oral Absorption Of Ppsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the hydrophobic nature of SLPs limits its encapsulation of hydrophilic peptides accounting for low EE. Hecq et al 102 dissolved Ins into the inner aqueous phase and then emulsified in an organic phase to prepare a bioadhesive cationic SLPs, which increased 2.5-fold the transshipment of capped Ins through co-cultured Caco-2/HT29 cells compared to free Ins. Boushra et al 103 adopted three different hydrophilic viscosity-enhancing agents (VAs): propylene glycol (PG), PEG 400 and PEG 600 within SLP cores to develop Ins-loaded NCs with enhanced viscosity.…”
Section: Lipid-based Particlesmentioning
confidence: 99%