The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2019.115357
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and evaluation of data-driven modeling for bubble size in turbulent air-water bubbly flows using artificial multi-layer neural networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Jung et al performed an efficient model that can accurately predict the size of cavitation bubbles on test data and in real systems. 110 The approach was to create a pipeline with a multilayer perceptron (MLP) model capable of simulating the size of cavitation bubbles for various parameters (Fig. 10b).…”
Section: Machine Learning For Bubblesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jung et al performed an efficient model that can accurately predict the size of cavitation bubbles on test data and in real systems. 110 The approach was to create a pipeline with a multilayer perceptron (MLP) model capable of simulating the size of cavitation bubbles for various parameters (Fig. 10b).…”
Section: Machine Learning For Bubblesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…57 Most of the studies on bubble characterization were focused on gas−liquid flows using the machine learning method. For example, Jung et al 58 applied ANN to successfully predict mean bubble diameter in turbulent air−water bubbly flows. Theßeling et al 59 adopted the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression algorithm as well as the regression treebased algorithm to estimate the diameter of a single bubble in a bubble column.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relative error of CHF is around 20% which is better than that of empirical correlation or mechanistic models. Jung et al (2020) investigated the bubble size distribution in turbulent airwater bubbly flows by using multi-layer ANNs. Compared to the 20% error of traditional theoretical models, the results of the use of ANNs show average relative error of 4.98% for the given experimental datasets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%