“…If the delivery under evaluation involves motion management, then the phantom will have to be able to be integrated into some commercial or in-house built motion testing system [129,130,178,179]. For some RT deliveries the E2E QA phantoms may need to be more anthropomorphic in external appearance (e.g., if the delivery requires phantom set-up in some patient immobilization system with set-up validation and repositioning) or to simulate internal structure heterogeneity with organ mimicking structures (e.g., if the E2E testing is being applied to RT delivery to specific anatomy and the assessment includes target conformity) [89,102,104,106,111,180,181]. The material for the phantom need not be exactly tissue or water equivalent although it should be similar to any organs of interest and should be well characterised by CT, and perhaps MR imaging, before use [174].…”