Development and Evaluation of an Interactive Simulation Module to Train the Use of an Electrosurgical Device

Hove, P. Diederick van; Verdaasdonk, E. G. G.; Dankelman, Jenny; Stassen, Laurents P. S.

doi:10.1089/lap.2013.0579

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 14 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…6,14 Also other studies about knowledge-based programs show positive results. 20 However, none of the currently offered teaching programs deal with all practical aspects of safe application of electrosurgery.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Art of Electrosurgery: Trainees and Experts

et al. 2017

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The benefits of electrosurgery have been acknowledged since the early 1920s, and nowadays more than 80% of surgical procedures involve devices that apply energy to tissues. Despite its widespread use, it is currently unknown how the operator’s choices with regard to instrument selection and application technique are related to complications. As such, the manner in which electrosurgery is applied can have a serious influence on the outcome of the procedure and the well-being of patients. The aim of this study is to investigate the variety of differences in usage of electrosurgical devices. Our approach is to measure these parameters to provide insight into application techniques. A sensor was developed that records the magnitude of electric current delivered to an electrosurgical device at a frequency of 10 Hz. The sensor is able to detect device activation times and a reliable estimate of the power-level settings. Data were recorded for 91 laparoscopic cholecystectomies performed by different surgeons and residents. Results of the current measurement data show differences in the way electrosurgery is applied by surgeons and residents during a laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Variations are seen in the number of activations, the activation time, and the approach for removal of the gallbladder. Analysis showed that experienced surgeons have a longer activation time than residents (3.01 vs 1.41 seconds, P < .001) and a lower number of activations (102 vs 123). This method offers the opportunity to relate application techniques to clinical outcome and to provide input for the development of a best practice model.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%