1986
DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1986.19-221
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and Evaluation of an Infant‐care Training Program With First‐time Fathers

Abstract: We evaluated the effectiveness of a multicomponent package in training infant-care skills to first-time fathers. After developing and socially validating a set of infant-care skills, we assessed the effects of training in a hospital-based program with expectant fathers (Experiment 1) and in a home-based program with fathers having varied degrees of experience with their infants (Experiment 2). In both experiments, a multiple probe design demonstrated that the training package was responsible for producing crit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We coded each study for one of three evaluation research designs: experimental (including randomized post‐only), quasi‐experimental, and one‐group/pre‐post. We identified five potential evaluation studies as one‐group/pre‐post (Dachman, Alessi, Vrazo, Fuqua, & Kerr, 1986; Danforth, Harvey, Ulaszek, & McKee, 2006; Haessly, 1995; Hawkins et al, 1994), including two codable studies in the Dachman et al study. The Dachman et al study, however, measured outcomes that were not comparable to those measured in the other studies.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We coded each study for one of three evaluation research designs: experimental (including randomized post‐only), quasi‐experimental, and one‐group/pre‐post. We identified five potential evaluation studies as one‐group/pre‐post (Dachman, Alessi, Vrazo, Fuqua, & Kerr, 1986; Danforth, Harvey, Ulaszek, & McKee, 2006; Haessly, 1995; Hawkins et al, 1994), including two codable studies in the Dachman et al study. The Dachman et al study, however, measured outcomes that were not comparable to those measured in the other studies.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Social support, in turn, has been shown to promote more appropriate involvement by parents who are at risk for interaction problems with their infants and children (Cochran, Larner, Riley, Gunnarsson, & Henderson, 1993). Some programs have been successful at increasing father -infant involvement by using techniques such as teaching fathers about developmental stages, encouraging responsiveness, teaching infant massage, and providing videotaped instruction specifically for fathers (Beale, 1999;Brophy-Herb, Gibbons, Omar, & Schiffman, 1999;Dachman, Alessi, & Vrazo, 1986;Mahoney, Wiggers, & Lash, 1998;McBride, 1991;Scholz & Samuels, 1992). However, a home visit program reported by Gross, Fogg, and Tucker (1994) increased psychological wellbeing and interaction with infants for mothers but not for fathers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reprints are available from John R. Lutzker, University ofJudaism, 15600 Mulholland Drive, Los Angeles, California 90077. (Dachman, Alessi, Vrazo, Fuqua, & Kerr, 1986;Landy et al, 1983;Lutzker, Lutzker, Braunling-McMorrow, & Eddleman, 1987), few studies have induded fathers, and few have focused on treating children's illnesses. Thus, the purpose of this research was to train young parents to assess relevant symptoms to judge the severity of a child's illness, what to do at home to comfort the child, and when to consult the child's physician or take the child for emergency treatment.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%