2022
DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14010172
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and Evaluation of an In Silico Dermal Absorption Model Relevant for Children

Abstract: The higher skin surface area to body weight ratio in children and the prematurity of skin in neonates may lead to higher chemical exposure as compared to adults. The objectives of this study were: (i) to provide a comprehensive review of the age-dependent anatomical and physiological changes in pediatric skin, and (ii) to construct and evaluate an age-dependent pediatric dermal absorption model. A comprehensive review was conducted to gather data quantifying the differences in the anatomy and physiology of chi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Stratum corneum thickness: Table 6 in [ 27 ] shows inter-site and within-site variability. The abdominal varies between 6 and 13 µm for a partially hydrated SC.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Stratum corneum thickness: Table 6 in [ 27 ] shows inter-site and within-site variability. The abdominal varies between 6 and 13 µm for a partially hydrated SC.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a fully hydrated SC, reference [ 10 ] proposes a stratum corneum thickness of 43 µm. To capture the variability in Table 6 in [ 27 ], we applied a similar uncertainty to the fully hydrated case.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method considers many intrinsic (e.g., age, genetics, and organ dysfunction) and extrinsic (e.g., drug–drug interactions) factors in a mechanistic manner. More specifically, dermal PBPK models describe skin permeation at or near the site of action and support alternative BE approaches through virtual screening of healthy individuals and patients in special populations (e.g., pediatric and pregnant populations) at the regulatory level ( Hamadeh et al, 2021 ; Yun et al, 2022 ). The particular advantage of the PBPK models in the context of topical formulations lies in their ability to include inter- and intra-subject variability in skin physiology parameters such as skin thickness, blood flow, and skin pH.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4,6,7 The overall goal of these grants, listed in Table 1, has been to develop in silico tools that would allow for a mechanistic description of the skin permeation of active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) following administration of dermatological drug products in virtual subjects of healthy and diseased populations. [8][9][10][11][12] These PBPK models incorporate drug product attributes allowing for product-specific predictions of the in vivo performance of that drug product. Importantly, by accounting for product quality attributes and the formulation-skin physiology interactions, the application of these models is not only useful in making informed decisions during the product development program, but also supporting alternative BE approaches on a case-by-case basis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quantitative methodologies, such as physiologically‐based PK (PBPK) modeling, have been one of the main areas of focus for FDA's GDUFA research program since its inception, and the first grant in the dermal area was awarded in 2014 with several to follow 4,6,7 . The overall goal of these grants, listed in Table 1, has been to develop in silico tools that would allow for a mechanistic description of the skin permeation of active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) following administration of dermatological drug products in virtual subjects of healthy and diseased populations 8–12 . These PBPK models incorporate drug product attributes allowing for product‐specific predictions of the in vivo performance of that drug product.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%