2005
DOI: 10.3141/1931-03
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and Evaluation of Aggregate Destination Choice Models for Trip Distribution in Florida

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
6

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
6
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…After calibration of trip distribution models, some goodnessof fit measures are needed. Several measures are presented in the literature (10,24,(26)(27)(28)(29)(30). Formulations of required goodnessoffit measures and other related works are presented in the following sections.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…After calibration of trip distribution models, some goodnessof fit measures are needed. Several measures are presented in the literature (10,24,(26)(27)(28)(29)(30). Formulations of required goodnessoffit measures and other related works are presented in the following sections.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The IOM has been used less than the GM has because of complexities in the calibration procedure (8). How ever, compared with the GM, the IOM is behavioral based (9) and less sensitive to the size and shape of study area (10). The IOM also produces better results in cases where destinations that satisfy the trip purpose are not uniformly distributed, like discrete attraction points, such as for shopping or study purposes (11).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The KRTM is also believed by the authors to be original in statistically estimating parameters related to the reluctance of travelers to cross major rivers and county lines [although turnpikes were used as a psychological barrier by Chow et al (15), and origin countydestination county k-factors have been common]. The amount of additional impedance represented by these psychological boundaries varied significantly for different stop types.…”
Section: Benefits and Costs Of New Krtmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Travel behaviour is one of the areas where GIS has been used for demand modelling of public (Choi and Jang, 2000) and private modes (Choi and Kim, 1996). GIS has been used to model travel choice (Byon et al, 2007;McGowen and McNally, 2007;Bricka and Bhat, 2006;Ogle et al, 2005;Tsui and Shalaby, 2006), destination choice (Chow et al, 2005), location choice (Nicholas et al, 2004;Shelton et al, 2004), mobility (Schlossberg, 2006), and accessibility (Hodge, 1997;Miller and Wu, 2000;Casas, 2003). It has been used for travel time forecasting (You and Kim, 2000), and risk and evacuation models (Church and Cova, 2000;Alexander and Waters, 2000;Horner and Downs, 2007).…”
Section: 3geomodelling Framework In Transportation Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%