2022
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263341
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and Evaluation of AccuPower COVID-19 Multiplex Real-Time RT-PCR Kit and AccuPower SARS-CoV-2 Multiplex Real-Time RT-PCR Kit for SARS-CoV-2 Detection in Sputum, NPS/OPS, Saliva and Pooled Samples

Abstract: Rapid and accurate detection of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is essential for the successful control of the current global COVID-19 pandemic. The real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (Real-time RT-PCR) is the most widely used detection technique. This research describes the development of two novel multiplex real-time RT-PCR kits, AccuPower® COVID-19 Multiplex Real-Time RT-PCR Kit (NCVM) specifically designed for use with the ExiStation™48 system (compri… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nowadays, the detection of virus RNA by RT-PCR is the most widely used detection technique for confirming SARS-CoV-2 infection. As previously reported in many literature, NPS and OPS were the most widely used upper respiratory tract specimens recommended for diagnosing SARS-CoV-2 RNA with RT-PCR (21)(22)(23). There was controversy in the literature about the ability of the two sampling methods to detect viruses (24)(25)(26)(27).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nowadays, the detection of virus RNA by RT-PCR is the most widely used detection technique for confirming SARS-CoV-2 infection. As previously reported in many literature, NPS and OPS were the most widely used upper respiratory tract specimens recommended for diagnosing SARS-CoV-2 RNA with RT-PCR (21)(22)(23). There was controversy in the literature about the ability of the two sampling methods to detect viruses (24)(25)(26)(27).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The COVID-19 pandemic became the catalyst for the development of accurate detection methods for SARS-CoV-2 in order to better support the clinicians and front-line healthcare professionals. However, development of effective vaccines and the availability of high-quality diagnostic methods remain essential [ 17 , 18 ]. Currently, one of the critical points remains the bottleneck of nucleic acid extraction kits, also due to the spread of the different and more transmissible newest SARS-CoV-2 lineages (BA.4, BA.5, BQ.1, XXB).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Published LLODs from other studies range from 83–288 cp/mL [ 26 , 27 ] for Aptima ® and from 62.5–125 cp/mL [ 28 , 29 ] for Fusion ® . Our analysis of LLOD for the Hologic SARS-CoV-2 assays (55–228 cp/mL for Aptima ® and 108–130 cp/mL for Fusion ® , Fig 5 ) agree with published ranges.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%