2011
DOI: 10.1007/s00436-011-2678-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and evaluation of a dipstick assay in diagnosis of human fasciolosis

Abstract: For the diagnosis of human fasciolosis, a new dipstick assay was developed and its diagnostic efficacy was evaluated in comparison to enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) using Fasciola gigantica excretory-secretory antigen. Sera samples were collected from patients with confirmed fasciolosis and patients with other parasitic diseases as well as from normal healthy individuals. The sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of the dipstick assay as well as ELISA were 100%, 96.7%, and 98.3%, respect… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(35 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such a rapid test could therefore be practically implemented in epidemiological surveys. A sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 96·7% have been preliminarily noted (Ali, 2012), although appropriate independent complete evaluation is still pending.…”
Section: Diagnosis With Blood Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a rapid test could therefore be practically implemented in epidemiological surveys. A sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 96·7% have been preliminarily noted (Ali, 2012), although appropriate independent complete evaluation is still pending.…”
Section: Diagnosis With Blood Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fasciolosis can affect human beings and all ruminant animals of agricultural importance [4], [5]. The geographically wide distribution of these parasites makes fasciolosis one of the most important helminth diseases with a global distribution [6][9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it requires more diagnostic tools to assist in the diagnosis. In the acute stage, serum immunological examination, such as ELISA, indirect fluorescent antibody test (IFA), indirect hemagglutination test (IHA), and counter-current immuneelectrophoresis (CIE), can be used as identification tools (16)(17)(18)(19). But the serological tests may have similar results with other schistosome infections.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%