1978
DOI: 10.1016/0005-7916(78)90008-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and evaluation of a placebo for studies of operant behavioral intervention

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(1 = not at all to 4 = a lot ). Daily questions about parent and child well-being were drawn from existing survey instruments and adapted and validated for daily use (Ananat & Gassman-Pines, 2021; Behar & Stringfield, 1974; Gassman-Pines & Schenck-Fontaine, 2019; Loney & Milich, 1982; Repetti & Wood, 1997).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1 = not at all to 4 = a lot ). Daily questions about parent and child well-being were drawn from existing survey instruments and adapted and validated for daily use (Ananat & Gassman-Pines, 2021; Behar & Stringfield, 1974; Gassman-Pines & Schenck-Fontaine, 2019; Loney & Milich, 1982; Repetti & Wood, 1997).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Daily child uncooperative behavior was measured with a single item asking: “How much was your child uncooperative today?” Answer choices were not at all, just a little , some, and a lot. This question was modified from an item in the inattention/overactivity with Aggression Conners Rating Scale (Loney & Milich, 1982), which asks parents to rate how much the adjective describes their child at the present time.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even on the occasions when expectancy questionnaires were employed, concerns have been raised about their validity as measures of the expectancy construct. Self-report, expectancy scales are reactive to demand characteristics and other artifacts inherent in obtrusive measurement (Jacobson & Baucom, 1977; Lick & Bootzin, 1975; Loney & Milich, 1978; Wilkins, 1984). As a consequence, Kazdin (1979) concluded that no strong case can be made about what is actually measured by expectancy scales.…”
Section: Measurement and Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%