2011
DOI: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000113
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and evaluation of a comprehensive clinical decision support taxonomy: comparison of front-end tools in commercial and internally developed electronic health record systems

Abstract: We developed and validated a comprehensive taxonomy of front-end CDS tools. A subsequent survey of commercial EHR vendors and leading healthcare institutions revealed a small core set of common CDS tools, but identified significant variability in the remainder of clinical decision support content.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
94
1
6

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
1
94
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…A number of attempts to build taxonomies of Clinical Decision Support (CDS) systems and rule-based alerts were made [24,25]. However, the authors were focused on types (front end/back end) and major groups as benefit, domain, and type of intervention.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of attempts to build taxonomies of Clinical Decision Support (CDS) systems and rule-based alerts were made [24,25]. However, the authors were focused on types (front end/back end) and major groups as benefit, domain, and type of intervention.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing taxonomies would not suffice because they do not readily map to a measurement framework. [4][5][6][7][8] We sought to generate metrics in sets rather than one by one to reduce the time and expense of developing and maintaining performance metrics for alerts.…”
Section: Objectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been a number of clinical decision support and alert taxonomies developed for different purposes. [4][5][6][7][8] …”
Section: Original Research and Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By now, it has been concluded that the intelligent diagnosis decision support systems have not been used widely, instead they often focused on the drug selection and prescription support [20], [21]. This current dilemma also contributes tremendously to the further development in this scholarly field.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meantime, there are some scholars who point out that the effectiveness of clinical diagnosis decision support systems depends greatly on the degree of acceptance by physicians [19]. Wright, Sittig, Ash, Bates, Feblowitz, Fraser and Middleton [20], [21] think it should be worth more concerns that the corresponding management and governance pay a great role in the application and development of technology of the clinical diagnosis decision support.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%