2020
DOI: 10.1101/2020.02.22.20025460
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and Evaluation of A CRISPR-based Diagnostic For 2019-novel Coronavirus

Abstract: Background 35 The recent outbreak of infections by the 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV), the third 36 zoonotic CoV has raised great public health concern. The demand for rapid and accurate 37 diagnosis of this novel pathogen brought significant clinical and technological challenges. 38 Currently, metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) and reverse-transcription PCR 39 (RT-PCR) are the most widely used molecular diagnostics for 2019-nCoV.40 Methods 41 2019-nCoV infections were confirmed in 52 specime… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
64
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak, genomes have been generated and shared at a remarkable pace, and we thank those who have contributed their data through GISAID [13]. We and others, relying on this data [14], have shown that it is possible to rapidly design CRISPR-based tools for detection and surveillance during an outbreak.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak, genomes have been generated and shared at a remarkable pace, and we thank those who have contributed their data through GISAID [13]. We and others, relying on this data [14], have shown that it is possible to rapidly design CRISPR-based tools for detection and surveillance during an outbreak.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The amplified product RNA activates Cas13a, which in turn cleaves a reporter RNA, liberating a fluorescent dye from a quencher. This method consistently detects synthetic SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA in the range between 10 and 100 copies per L of input, only requires a lateral flow dipstick for visual readout of the detection result, and can be completed in 40 minutes (Hou et al 2020) or 57 minutes Metsky et al 2020) after the RNA extraction step. SHERLOCK (termed "CRISPR-nCoV" in Hou et al 2020) also demonstrated its diagnostic potential by detecting SARS-CoV-2 RNA with 100% sensitivity in 52 patient samples (Hou et al 2020).…”
Section: Crispr-based Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…70 A SHERLOCK protocol for detecting SARS-CoV-2 has been released, 71 and another Cas13a-based detection system has been tested with SARS-CoV-2 clinical isolates. 72 Protein Testing. Viral protein antigens and antibodies that are created in response to a SARS-CoV-2 infection can be used for diagnosing COVID-19.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%