2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.cie.2022.108068
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and comparison of two new multi-period queueing reliability models using discrete-event simulation and a simulation–optimization approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…OptQuest is oriented toward optimizing a simulation model, i.e. a simulation model is established for a given system, and then, OptQuest is used to optimize the control parameters of the system (Frichi, 2022). It is an optimization add-on for Arena to optimize the control variables of the simulated systems (Borodin et al , 2019).…”
Section: Proposed Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…OptQuest is oriented toward optimizing a simulation model, i.e. a simulation model is established for a given system, and then, OptQuest is used to optimize the control parameters of the system (Frichi, 2022). It is an optimization add-on for Arena to optimize the control variables of the simulated systems (Borodin et al , 2019).…”
Section: Proposed Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DES, which is widely acknowledged for its effectiveness in analyzing complex flows that are crucial in simulations, is particularly skilled in assessing potential scenarios at critical decision points [32]. The advantages of DES contribute to its wide range of applications in various fields, including logistics, healthcare, disaster management, and manufacturing [31,32,33,34].…”
Section: Discrete Event Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model developed by Frichi et al. [3] considers a variable reliability α m ranging from α 1 =1% to α 90 =90%. For this model, the number of ambulances of type k required by demand area i during period t for α m reliable coverage ( α 1 =1%, …; α 90 =90%) is provided in Table 16 .…”
Section: Data Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%