2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2020.04.206
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and Clinical Validation of Discriminatory Multitarget Digital Droplet PCR Assays for the Detection of Hot Spot KRAS and NRAS Mutations in Cell-Free DNA

Abstract: subprojects C9 (R.F. and M.B.) and Z1 (M.B.); the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research within the framework of the e:Med research and funding concept CoNfirm FKZ 01ZX1708F (M.B.); and a Deutsche Gesellschaft für Hämatologie und Medizinische Onkologie e. V. (DGHO)eGesellschaft für Medizinische InnovationeHämatologie und Onkologie mbH (GMIHO) thesis fellowship (S.H.).Disclosures: None declared.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We analyzed mutated KRAS in cell-free DNA with discriminatory ddPCR assays and integrated results with CA19-9 levels for association with relapse and survival endpoints. Numerous studies have unveiled the potential of the analysis of cell-free mutated tumor DNA as novel diagnostic [26] What takes our study apart is the use of discriminatory multi-target KRAS ddPCR assays [29] to directly identify KRAS SNVs without performing previous tumor NGS. These assays have higher sensitivity compared to many available NGS-based assays (Hussung et al).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We analyzed mutated KRAS in cell-free DNA with discriminatory ddPCR assays and integrated results with CA19-9 levels for association with relapse and survival endpoints. Numerous studies have unveiled the potential of the analysis of cell-free mutated tumor DNA as novel diagnostic [26] What takes our study apart is the use of discriminatory multi-target KRAS ddPCR assays [29] to directly identify KRAS SNVs without performing previous tumor NGS. These assays have higher sensitivity compared to many available NGS-based assays (Hussung et al).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We performed univariate and multivariate survival analyses (Supplemental Tables 1 and 2, Figure S1) for established clinicopathologic variables and found a trend towards inferior RFS but not OS for R1 resection (Figure S1 A,B), a signi cant inverse correlation between elevated CA19-9 in the rst sample collected after resection and RFS and OS (Figure S1 C,D) and signi cantly better OS for patients undergoing adjuvant chemotherapy ( Figure S1 E,F). [29]. At the postoperative stage, no molecular pathology data was available for any tumor.…”
Section: Patient Cohortmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We analyzed mutated KRAS in cell-free DNA with discriminatory ddPCR assays and integrated results with CA 19-9 levels for association with relapse and survival endpoints. Numerous studies have unveiled the potential of the analysis of cell-free mutated tumor DNA as novel diagnostic [27] What takes our study apart is the use of discriminatory multi-target KRAS ddPCR assays [30] to directly identify KRAS SNVs without performing previous tumor NGS. These assays have higher sensitivity compared to many available NGS-based assays [29].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The absolute number of copies per milliliter of blood were calculated as follows: Copies/mL plasma =(copies per µL of reaction as per QuantaSoft analysis software version 1.7.4.0917) × (volume of ddPCR reaction) × ([volume eluted/volume of DNA used in reaction]/volume of plasma used for cfDNA extraction). Mutant allele frequency was calculated as: Mutant allele frequency = mutant copies/mL of plasma / (mutant copies/mL of plasma + wild−type copies/mL of plasma).Limit of detection (LOD) and limit of blank (LOB) of the individual assays have been previously described[30] .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%