2016
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-15-2057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and Clinical Validation of a Blood Test Based on 29-Gene Expression for Early Detection of Colorectal Cancer

Abstract: Purpose: A blood test for early detection of colorectal cancer is a valuable tool for testing asymptomatic individuals and reducing colorectal cancer-related mortality. The objective of this study was to develop and validate a novel blood test able to differentiate patients with colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps (AP) from individuals with a negative colonoscopy.Experimental Design: A case-control, multicenter clinical study was designed to collect blood samples from patients referred for colonoscopy or … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(39 reference statements)
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, ctDNA poorly correlates with yet another classical CRC readout, opening the possibility to integrate ctDNA and CEA into a single early-detection multimarker assay. From the available data, it appears that our results and conclusions are similar, although not identical, to those by Ciarloni et al [25] and Cohen et al [28].…”
Section: Ctdna and Serum Biomarkerssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Thus, ctDNA poorly correlates with yet another classical CRC readout, opening the possibility to integrate ctDNA and CEA into a single early-detection multimarker assay. From the available data, it appears that our results and conclusions are similar, although not identical, to those by Ciarloni et al [25] and Cohen et al [28].…”
Section: Ctdna and Serum Biomarkerssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In addition, although based on molecular barcoding, the TST panel used for LB was not specifically designed for low-noise variant calling. With these caveats and limitations, the reported ctDNA sensitivities by ourselves, Ciarloni et al and Cohen et al [25,28] are not drastically different (58.8% vs 78 and 65%, approximately), and invariably lower than those (93%) reported in metastatic cancer [13]. We conclude that even simple LB assays, like the one described herein, may find immediate clinical application in conditions of low CRC burden.…”
Section: Sensitivity and Specificity Of Lb At Surgerymentioning
confidence: 44%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Owing to inter-and intrapatient heterogeneity, a cancer marker that combines multiple analytes and functions as a signature is more specific and sensitive. For example, Colox 1 , a blood test based on a 29-gene panel, detects colorectal cancer and large adenomatous polyps with sensitivities of 78.1% and 52.3%, respectively, with 92.20% specificity [34]. Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from the TME are detectable at the very early stages of cancer and have been used for the early diagnosis of lung, head and neck, breast, gastric, and liver cancers as well as in mesothelioma [35].…”
Section: Signatures For Cancer Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, testing for 29 genes expressed in peripheral blood mononuclear cells and for two proteinaceous plasma biomarkers (carcinoembryonic antigen and CYFRA21‐1) had 92.2% specificity and 78.1% sensitivity for the early detection of colorectal cancer. [ 48 ]…”
Section: Emerging Strategies For Biomarker Development For Early Cancmentioning
confidence: 99%