2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2017.05.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and characterization of bacterial cellulose produced by cashew tree residues as alternative carbon source

Abstract: Bacterial cellulose (BC) has been extensively exploited for applications in materials science, biomedical and technological fields. The BC production demands culture media rich in carbon sources. Agro-forestry residues constitute an interesting source of nutrients for microorganism, but they are frequently wasted. For cashew crop, exudate is periodically extracted from the tree trunks to increase the production of cashew nut, the most valuable product from cashew trees that produces about 700 g of exudate/year… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

5
36
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
5
36
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The high cost of culture media for BC production lead us to propose some strategies to overcome this drawback aiming its industrial production. So, the use of residues or by-products from agroforest and food industry as carbon and nitrogen sources for new compositions of culture media allow us to reduce the cost of BC production besides maintaining the high quality of produced BC (Pacheco et al, 2017). Jahan et al (2018) showed that using crude distillery effluent the maximum of BC production by Gluconacetobacter oboediens was 8.5 g/L.…”
Section: Cost Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The high cost of culture media for BC production lead us to propose some strategies to overcome this drawback aiming its industrial production. So, the use of residues or by-products from agroforest and food industry as carbon and nitrogen sources for new compositions of culture media allow us to reduce the cost of BC production besides maintaining the high quality of produced BC (Pacheco et al, 2017). Jahan et al (2018) showed that using crude distillery effluent the maximum of BC production by Gluconacetobacter oboediens was 8.5 g/L.…”
Section: Cost Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Wu et al 2016), thereby requiring further purification to obtain the pure cellulose, hence affecting the cost of production. This has led to a shift in focus to bacterial or enzymatic cellulose production (Islam et al 2017) Gluconacetobacter, Acetobacter, and Komagataeibacter genera have been found to be the best cellulose producers within the bacteria kingdom (Illeghems et al 2016;Pacheco et al 2017) with Acetobacter giving the purest and highest fibril yield (Franz and Blaschek 1990). The cellulose produced by these microorganisms, known as bacterial cellulose (BC) is obtained as a gel-like three-dimensional mat formed by entangled nanofibrils of cellulose (Pacheco et al 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has led to a shift in focus to bacterial or enzymatic cellulose production (Islam et al 2017) Gluconacetobacter, Acetobacter, and Komagataeibacter genera have been found to be the best cellulose producers within the bacteria kingdom (Illeghems et al 2016;Pacheco et al 2017) with Acetobacter giving the purest and highest fibril yield (Franz and Blaschek 1990). The cellulose produced by these microorganisms, known as bacterial cellulose (BC) is obtained as a gel-like three-dimensional mat formed by entangled nanofibrils of cellulose (Pacheco et al 2017). Structurally, BC is composed of a dense and well-organized three-dimensional network of fibrils that forms porous sheets with higher crystallinity, thermal stability, and mechanical strength far superior to plant cellulose (Stumpf et al 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations