2015
DOI: 10.1007/s11032-015-0307-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and characterisation of EST-SSR markers by transcriptome sequencing in taro (Colocasia esculenta (L.) Schoot)

Abstract: Taro (Colocasia esculenta) is an important crop with a long history of cultivation. In this study 5278 SSRs were identified in taro transcriptome data. A total of 2858 primer pairs were designed for marker development. 100 primers were randomly selected and synthesized. Among them, 72 primer pairs were successfully amplified and 62 were polymorphic in taro accessions. The number of alleles ranged from 2 to 14 for each different polymorphic locus and the polymorphism information content valued ranged from 0.01 … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
32
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
5
32
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the distribution density of EST-SSRs was one SSR in every 6.98 kb. This value was higher than the frequency reported in the tree peony (1/9.24 kb) and Pinus dabeshanensis (1/23.08 kb) (Xiang et al, 2015), but lower than that in N. sericea (1/ 3.8 kb) (Chen et al, 2015) and taro (1/5.90 kb) (You et al, 2015). Chrysanthemum may have a higher frequency of EST-SSRs, but alternative explanations, such as the size of the data set, SSR search criteria, and database-mining tools also should be considered (Varshney et al, 2005).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 64%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Furthermore, the distribution density of EST-SSRs was one SSR in every 6.98 kb. This value was higher than the frequency reported in the tree peony (1/9.24 kb) and Pinus dabeshanensis (1/23.08 kb) (Xiang et al, 2015), but lower than that in N. sericea (1/ 3.8 kb) (Chen et al, 2015) and taro (1/5.90 kb) (You et al, 2015). Chrysanthemum may have a higher frequency of EST-SSRs, but alternative explanations, such as the size of the data set, SSR search criteria, and database-mining tools also should be considered (Varshney et al, 2005).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 64%
“…In contrast, CCG/CGG (0.6%) motifs were very rare (see Fig. 1), found mostly in monocots such as maize, barley, and taro (Morgante et al, 2002;Toth et al, 2000;You et al, 2015). The observed rarity of CCG/CGG repeat units has been reported in some dicots, such as the common bean, D. versipellis, S. guianensis, N. sericea, P. dabeshanensis, and the tree peony (Chen et al, 2014(Chen et al, , 2015Ding et al, 2015;Guo et al, 2014;Wu et al, 2014;Xiang et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Coordinates 1 and 2 represent the 21.58 and 15.02% of the total variance, respectively five of the selected EST-SSRs showed trinucleotide repeated motifs and only one was a tetranucleotide, likely reflecting the distribution of repeat regions among transcribed and repeated DNAs in many other plants (Morgante et al 2002;Varshney et al 2005). The absence of longer repeated patterns within the selected set probably depends on their low frequency (288 long repeats found in the EST collections versus 1450 trinucleotidic patterns) and their low polymorphism level, as already observed in other plant species (Boccacci et al 2015;Long et al 2015;You et al 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…With the development of next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies, we can obtain a large number of EST-SSRs from high-throughput transcriptome data cost-effectively. Recently, numerous EST-SSR markers were mined by transcriptome sequencing in various plants, which were proved to be effective and more conserved compared to non-coding sequences (Wu et al, 2014;Liu et al, 2015;You et al, 2015). Moreover, some important horticultural traits can be directly mapped using EST-SSRs due to their association with coding region (Bouck & Vision, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%