2021
DOI: 10.1186/s12911-021-01620-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and assessment of the usability of a web-based referral to treatment tool for persons with substance use disorders

Abstract: Background Hospitalized people with unhealthy substance use should be referred to treatment. Although inpatient referral resources are often available, clinicians report that outpatient referral networks are not well-established. The purpose of this manuscript is to describe the development and usability testing of a web-based Referral to Treatment Tool (RTT © 2020 Trustees of Indiana University, all rights reserved) designed to identify treatment centers for people with unhealthy substance use… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We used both quantitative and qualitative methods for usability testing. The SUS and the EUCS scales have been widely used and well-validated to assess interventions in the domains of ease of use and usefulness [28,29,[31][32][33][34][35][36]. The SUS is a 10-item scale developed for the assessment of a broad range of products; scores (ranging from 0=low usability to 100=high usability) correspond to the following adjective descriptors: worst imaginable, awful, poor, okay, good, excellent, and best imaginable [27,37].…”
Section: Approach To Usability Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used both quantitative and qualitative methods for usability testing. The SUS and the EUCS scales have been widely used and well-validated to assess interventions in the domains of ease of use and usefulness [28,29,[31][32][33][34][35][36]. The SUS is a 10-item scale developed for the assessment of a broad range of products; scores (ranging from 0=low usability to 100=high usability) correspond to the following adjective descriptors: worst imaginable, awful, poor, okay, good, excellent, and best imaginable [27,37].…”
Section: Approach To Usability Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%