Transactions of the American Nuclear Society - Volume 123 2020
DOI: 10.13182/t123-33503
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and Assessment of Physics-guided Machine Learning for Prognosis System

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The selection of the actual model and method is usually driven by the problem and specific to the application. As an example in nuclear systems, Gurgen et al (2020) recently proposed a physics-guided RNN (with LSTM blocks) prognostic model within the NAMAC system to predict the evolution of fuel centerline temperature in loss of flow transient conditions and demonstrated its superior performance over pure data-driven prognosis. In other fields, research related to the hybrid approach has been much more active (Liao and Kottig, 2014;Atamuradov et al, 2017).…”
Section: Hybrid Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The selection of the actual model and method is usually driven by the problem and specific to the application. As an example in nuclear systems, Gurgen et al (2020) recently proposed a physics-guided RNN (with LSTM blocks) prognostic model within the NAMAC system to predict the evolution of fuel centerline temperature in loss of flow transient conditions and demonstrated its superior performance over pure data-driven prognosis. In other fields, research related to the hybrid approach has been much more active (Liao and Kottig, 2014;Atamuradov et al, 2017).…”
Section: Hybrid Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%